Usage Information
Abstract
Inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) are important causes of progressive, irreversible blindness. Hereditary macular diseases, in particular, are significant in their effect on the specialized, central cone photoreceptor–rich macula responsible for high resolution vision. Autosomal dominant Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD), caused by variants in the BEST1 gene, is one of the most common inherited macular dystrophies. Gene therapies have emerged as promising treatments for IRDs, but a lack of suitable animal models has hindered progress both in treatments and in understanding the mechanisms underlying macular diseases. Here, we report a Macaca fascicularis carrying a heterozygous potential pathogenic BEST1p.Q327E variant that disrupts the BEST1 ion channel by destabilizing the A195 helix, mirroring the structural perturbations seen in certain human pathological mutants. Longitudinal imaging over 2 years revealed progressive macular changes, including subfoveal cleft enlargement, lipid-rich deposit accumulation, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) disruption, and central-to-peripheral photoreceptor degeneration, recapitulating early human BVMD pathology. Histopathology demonstrated diminished BEST1 expression, attenuation of the RPE-photoreceptor interface, and 2 distinct types of lipid deposits, including heretofore unappreciated cone mitochondrial-enriched lesions, highlighting selective cone mitochondria vulnerability. This is, to our knowledge, the first nonhuman primate model of inherited macular dystrophy, and it links BEST1 mutations, mitochondrial dysfunction, and progressive macular degeneration, offering new insights into BVMD pathophysiology and highlighting its utility for studying disease progression and potential therapeutic interventions.
Authors
Wei Yi, Mingming Xu, Ying Xue, Yingxue Cao, Ziqi Yang, Lingli Zhou, Yang Zhou, Le Shi, Xiaomei Mai, Zehui Sun, Wenjie Qing, Yuying Li, Aolun Qing, Kaiwen Zhang, Lechun Ou, Shoudeng Chen, Elia J. Duh, Xialin Liu
Usage data is cumulative from May 2025 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,760 | 179 |
| 528 | 75 | |
| Figure | 624 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 325 | 13 |
| Citation downloads | 153 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,390 | 267 |
| Total Views | 4,657 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
