Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent arrhythmia with known detriments such as heart failure, stroke, and cognitive decline even in patients without prior stroke. The mechanisms by which AF leads to cognitive dysfunction are yet unknown, and there is a lack of animal models to study this disease process. We previously developed a murine model of spontaneous and prolonged episodes of AF, a double transgenic mouse model with cardiac-specific expression of a gain-of-function mutant voltage-gated sodium channel (DTG-AF mice). Herein, we show, for the first time to our knowledge, a murine model of AF without any cerebral infarcts exhibiting cognitive dysfunction, including impaired visual learning and cognitive flexibility on touch screen testing. Mesenteric resistance arterial function of DTG-AF mice showed significant loss of myogenic tone, increased wall thickness and distensibility, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Brain pial arteries also showed increased wall thickness and mitochondrial enlargement. Furthermore, DTG-AF mice have decreased brain perfusion on laser speckle contrast imaging compared with controls. Cumulatively, these findings demonstrate that AF leads to vascular structural and functional alterations necessary for dynamic cerebral autoregulation, resulting in increased cerebral stress and cognitive dysfunction. Expression of mitochondrial catalase (mCAT) to reduce mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) was sufficient to prevent vascular dysfunction due to AF, restore perfusion, and improve cognitive flexibility.
Pavithran Guttipatti, Ruiping Ji, Najla Saadallah, Uma Mahesh R. Avula, Deniz Z. Sonmez, Albert Fang, Eric Li, Amar D. Desai, Samantha Parsons, Parmanand Dasrat, Christine Sison, Yanping Sun, Chris N. Goulbourne, Steven R. Reiken, Elaine Y. Wan
Usage data is cumulative from October 2025 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 937 | 3 |
| 276 | 0 | |
| Figure | 82 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 119 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 108 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,522 | 3 |
| Total Views | 1,525 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.