Background Ready-to-use supplemental foods (RUSF) are energy-dense meals used to treat moderate and severe acute childhood malnutrition. Weight recovery with RUSF is heterogeneous, therefore we investigated whether environmental enteric dysfunction (EED), systemic inflammation, and gut microbiota predict RUSF response.Methods We followed nutritional status and RUSF outcomes in a rural birth cohort of 416 Pakistani infants. Acha Mum, a chickpea-based RUSF, was administered daily for 8 weeks to children who developed wasting (weight-for-length Z-score <–2).Results Of 187 treated with RUSF, 112 showed no immediate improvement in weight-for-age. Machine learning identified nine biomarkers that collectively predicted RUSF response with 73% accuracy. Gut microbiome composition before and after supplementation predicted response with 93% and 98% accuracy, respectively. Responders showed microbiome restructuring, with increased growth-associated taxa and reduced Gammaproteobacteria relative to nonresponders. A subset of extreme nonresponders—whose microbiome profiles resembled those of responders—displayed markedly abnormal biomarkers of inflammation, suggesting adverse host factors constrain gut microbiota benefits for RUSF efficacy.Conclusion EED, systemic inflammation, and gut microbiota predict acute nutritional responses to Acha Mum, setting the stage for precision use of RUSF and adjunctive therapies in addressing the global burden of childhood malnutrition in low- and middle-income countries.
Zehra Jamil, Gabriel F. Hanson, Junaid Iqbal, G. Brett Moreau, Najeeha Talat Iqbal, Sheraz Ahmed, Aneeta Hotwani, Furqan Kabir, Fayaz Umrani, Kamran Sadiq, Kumail Ahmed, Indika Mallawaarachchi, Jennie Z. Ma, Fatima Aziz, S. Asad Ali, Sean R. Moore
Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through August 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 443 | 8 |
118 | 0 | |
Figure | 101 | 0 |
Table | 24 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 46 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 31 | 0 |
Totals | 763 | 8 |
Total Views | 771 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.