Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Imlunestrant a next-generation oral SERD overcomes ESR1 mutant resistance in estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer
Shira Sherman, Zachary M. Sandusky, Douglas Russo, David Zak, Agostina Nardone, Delia Friel, Francisco Hermida-Prado, Capucine Heraud, Genevra Kuziel, Ana Verma, Giorgio Gaglia, Sheheryar Kabraji, Quang-De Nguyen, Sandro Santagata, Sean W. Fanning, Rinath Jeselsohn
Shira Sherman, Zachary M. Sandusky, Douglas Russo, David Zak, Agostina Nardone, Delia Friel, Francisco Hermida-Prado, Capucine Heraud, Genevra Kuziel, Ana Verma, Giorgio Gaglia, Sheheryar Kabraji, Quang-De Nguyen, Sandro Santagata, Sean W. Fanning, Rinath Jeselsohn
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Oncology

Imlunestrant a next-generation oral SERD overcomes ESR1 mutant resistance in estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Estrogen receptor α (ER) is a critical driver of tumorigenesis and tumor progression in most breast cancers. Endocrine therapies (ET) targeting ER are central to treating hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, but resistance poses a clinical challenge. Some resistance mechanisms, particularly those involving estrogen-independent activity such as the ESR1 mutations, rely on ER signaling, supporting the need for next-generation ET. We investigated the preclinical efficacy of imlunestrant, an oral selective ER degrader, in ER-positive breast cancer preclinical models, including models harboring the Y537S ESR1 mutation, an activating mutation. Imlunestrant demonstrated antagonistic activity and effective degradation of both WT and mutant ER, resulting in cell growth suppression. In vivo, imlunestrant outperformed fulvestrant, leading to tumor regression in a patient-derived xenograft harboring the Y537S ESR1 mutation. Cyclic mutiplexed immunofluorescence and transcriptomic analysis revealed enhanced cell cycle arrest and downregulation of estrogen-responsive genes with imlunestrant treatment. Additionally, a genome-wide CRISPR knock–out screen identified several vulnerabilities that were either persistent or acquired after imlunestrant treatment, providing a rationale for future studies of combination treatments with imlunestrant. Collectively, these results highlight the on-target and selective activity of imlunestrant, which can circumvent resistance engendered by the Y537S ESR1 mutation.

Authors

Shira Sherman, Zachary M. Sandusky, Douglas Russo, David Zak, Agostina Nardone, Delia Friel, Francisco Hermida-Prado, Capucine Heraud, Genevra Kuziel, Ana Verma, Giorgio Gaglia, Sheheryar Kabraji, Quang-De Nguyen, Sandro Santagata, Sean W. Fanning, Rinath Jeselsohn

×

Figure 1

Antagonistic and ER degradation activity of imlunestrant.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Antagonistic and ER degradation activity of imlunestrant.
(A) Cell growt...
(A) Cell growth studies depicted as cell number fold change for MCF7 (left) or T47D (right) cells during treatment up to 8 days with DMSO or imlunestrant (IML). Error bars denote ± SD. Two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. (B) Normalized cell proliferation for MCF7 (left) or T47D (right) cells expressing ER-WT or ER-Y537S and treated with a dose-response of imlunestrant for 5 days. Error bars with average ± SD. Two-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple comparisons test. (C) Normalized luciferase signal in MCF7 ERE-LUC cells after hormone deprivation (HD) and treatment with or without E2 (1 nM) and imlunestrant (0, 50 nM, 500 nM, or 1,000 nM) for 1 hour, (D) 6 hours, or (E) 24 hours. Bar graph with averages. Error bars denote ± SD. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. (F) Western blot of whole cell lysates for ER and GAPDH in MCF7 cells in HD media treated with fulvestrant (FULV; 100 nM, 24 hours) or imlunestrant (IML; 100 nM from 0–72 hours), as indicated. Densitometry of ER levels normalized to DMSO and GAPDH. (G) Western blot for ER WT (lower band) and ER mutant (HA-tagged, upper band) and GAPDH in MCF7 ER-Y537S cells in HD media treated with FULV (100 nM, 24 hours) or IML (100 nM, 0 to 72 hours), as indicated. Densitometry of ER mutant levels normalized to DMSO and GAPDH. (H) Colony assay crystal violet staining results from MCF7 or T47D cells with ER WT or ER-Y537S expression and treatment with imlunestrant (0 to 100 nM, as indicated) for 2 weeks in full media. (I) Relative confluency of colony assay crystal violet staining in H. Bar graph with average ± SD. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts