Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are known to play critical roles in tissue repair via provision of growth factors, such as amphiregulin (Areg). Areg-producing Tregs have previously been difficult to study because of an inability to isolate live Areg-producing cells. In this report, we created a reporter mouse to detect Areg expression in live cells (AregThy1.1). We employed influenza A and bleomycin models of lung damage to sort Areg-producing and non-Areg-producing Tregs for transcriptomic analyses. Single-cell RNA-Seq revealed distinct subpopulations of Tregs and allowed transcriptomic comparisons of damage-induced populations. Single-cell TCR sequencing showed that Treg clonal expansion was biased toward Areg-producing Tregs and largely occurred within damage-induced subgroups. Gene module analysis revealed functional divergence of Tregs into immunosuppression-oriented and tissue repair–oriented groups, leading to identification of candidate receptors for induction of repair activity in Tregs. We tested these using an ex vivo assay for Treg-mediated tissue repair, identifying 4-1BB agonism as a mechanism for reparative activity induction. Overall, we demonstrate that the AregThy1.1 mouse is a promising tool for investigating tissue repair activity in leukocytes.
Lucas F. Loffredo, Katherine A. Kaiser, Adam Kornberg, Samhita Rao, Kenia de los Santos-Alexis, Arnold Han, Nicholas Arpaia
Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through January 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,378 | 105 |
| 270 | 21 | |
| Figure | 463 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 122 | 4 |
| Citation downloads | 57 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,290 | 130 |
| Total Views | 2,420 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.