Pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGGs) are the most aggressive brain tumors in children, necessitating innovative therapies to improve outcomes. Unlike adult gliomas, recent research reveals that childhood gliomas have distinct biological features, requiring specific treatment strategies. Here, we focused on deciphering unique genetic dependencies specific to childhood gliomas. Using a pooled CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screening approach on 65 pediatric and 10 adult high-grade glioma (HGG) cell lines, myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL1) emerged as a key antiapoptotic gene essential in pediatric but not adult gliomas. We demonstrated that MCL1 is targetable using current small molecule inhibitors, and its inhibition leads to potent anticancer activity across pediatric HGG cell lines irrespective of genotype. Employing predictive modeling approaches on a large set of childhood cancer cell lines with multiomics data features, we identified a potentially previously unreported cluster of CpG sites in the antiapoptotic BCL-xL/BCL2L1 gene, which predicted MCL1 inhibitor response. We extended these data across multiple pediatric tumor types, showing that BCL2L1 methylation is a broad predictor of MCL1 dependency in vitro and in vivo. Overall, our multidimensional, integrated genomic approach identified MCL1 as a promising therapeutic target in several BCL2L1-methylated pediatric cancers, offering a translational strategy to identify patients most likely to benefit from MCL1 inhibitor therapy.
Shazia Adjumain, Paul Daniel, Claire Xin Sun, Gabrielle Bradshaw, Nicole J. Chew, Vanessa Tsui, Hanbyeol Lee, Melissa Loi, Nataliya Zhukova, Dilru Habarakada, Abigail Yoel, Vijesh G. Vaghjiani, Shaye Game, Louise E. Ludlow, Naama Neeman, E. Alejandro Sweet-Cordero, David D. Eisenstat, Jason E. Cain, Ron Firestein
Usage data is cumulative from January 2025 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 457 | 0 |
197 | 0 | |
Figure | 75 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 205 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 7 | 0 |
Totals | 941 | 0 |
Total Views | 941 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.