Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2025;10(1):e184518. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.184518.
Abstract
The availability and integration of electrophysiological and molecular data from the living brain is critical in understanding and diagnosing complex human disease. Intracranial stereo electroencephalography (SEEG) electrodes used for identifying the seizure focus in patients with epilepsy could enable the integration of such multimodal data. Here, we report multimodal profiling of epileptic brain activity via explanted depth electrodes (MoPEDE), a method that recovers extensive protein-coding transcripts, including cell type markers, DNA methylation, and short variant profiles from explanted SEEG electrodes matched with electrophysiological and radiological data allowing for high-resolution reconstructions of brain structure and function. We found gene expression gradients that corresponded with the neurophysiology-assigned epileptogenicity index but also outlier molecular fingerprints in some electrodes, potentially indicating seizure generation or propagation zones not detected during electroclinical assessments. Additionally, we identified DNA methylation profiles indicative of transcriptionally permissive or restrictive chromatin states and SEEG-adherent differentially expressed and methylated genes not previously associated with epilepsy. Together, these findings validate that RNA profiles and genome-wide epigenetic data from explanted SEEG electrodes offer high-resolution surrogate molecular landscapes of brain activity. The MoPEDE approach has the potential to enhance diagnostic decisions and deepen our understanding of epileptogenic network processes in the human brain.
Authors
Anuj Kumar Dwivedi, Arun Mahesh, Albert Sanfeliu, Julian Larkin, Rebecca A. Siwicki, Kieron J. Sweeney, Donncha F. O’Brien, Peter Widdess-Walsh, Simone Picelli, David C. Henshall, Vijay K. Tiwari
Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,262 | 453 |
| 556 | 90 | |
| Figure | 522 | 4 |
| Table | 83 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 393 | 70 |
| Citation downloads | 170 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,986 | 617 |
| Total Views | 5,603 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
