Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(21):e184138. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.184138.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease with significant heterogeneity in disease course and progression. Genetic studies have identified numerous loci associated with MS risk, but the genetic basis of disease progression remains elusive. To address this, we leveraged the Collaborative Cross (CC), a genetically diverse mouse strain panel, and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). The 32 CC strains studied captured a wide spectrum of EAE severity, trajectory, and presentation, including severe-progressive, monophasic, relapsing remitting, and axial rotary–EAE (AR-EAE), accompanied by distinct immunopathology. Sex differences in EAE severity were observed in 6 strains. Quantitative trait locus analysis revealed distinct genetic linkage patterns for different EAE phenotypes, including EAE severity and incidence of AR-EAE. Machine learning–based approaches prioritized candidate genes for loci underlying EAE severity (Abcc4 and Gpc6) and AR-EAE (Yap1 and Dync2h1). This work expands the EAE phenotypic repertoire and identifies potentially novel loci controlling unique EAE phenotypes, supporting the hypothesis that heterogeneity in MS disease course is driven by genetic variation.
Authors
Emily A. Nelson, Anna L. Tyler, Taylor Lakusta-Wong, Karolyn G. Lahue, Katherine C. Hankes, Cory Teuscher, Rachel M. Lynch, Martin T. Ferris, J. Matthew Mahoney, Dimitry N. Krementsov
Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,126 | 228 |
| 222 | 35 | |
| Figure | 574 | 0 |
| Table | 206 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 245 | 6 |
| Citation downloads | 120 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,493 | 269 |
| Total Views | 2,762 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
