Hypertension and transient increases in blood pressure from extreme exertion are risk factors for aortic dissection in patients with age-related vascular degeneration or inherited connective tissue disorders. Yet, a common experimental model of angiotensin II–induced aortopathy in mice appears independent of high blood pressure, as lesions do not occur in response to an alternative vasoconstrictor, norepinephrine, and are not prevented by cotreatment with a vasodilator, hydralazine. We investigated vasoconstrictor administration to adult mice following 1 week of disrupted TGF-β signaling in smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Norepinephrine increased blood pressure and induced aortic dissection by 7 days and even within 30 minutes (as did angiotensin II) that was prevented by hydralazine. Initial medial injury manifested as blood extravasation among SMCs and fibrillar matrix, progressive delamination from accumulation of blood, and stretched or ruptured SMCs with persistent attachments to elastic fibers. Altered regulatory contractile molecule expression was not of pathological importance. Rather, reduced synthesis of extracellular matrix yielded a vulnerable aortic phenotype by decreasing medial collagen, most dynamically basement membrane–associated multiplexin collagen, and impairing cell-matrix adhesion. We conclude that transient and sustained increases in blood pressure can cause dissection in aortas rendered vulnerable by inhibition of TGF-β–driven extracellular matrix production by SMCs.
Bo Jiang, Pengwei Ren, Changshun He, Mo Wang, Sae-Il Murtada, María Jesús Ruiz-Rodríguez, Yu Chen, Abhay B. Ramachandra, Guangxin Li, Lingfeng Qin, Roland Assi, Martin A. Schwartz, Jay D. Humphrey, George Tellides
Usage data is cumulative from February 2025 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,801 | 254 |
| 519 | 64 | |
| Figure | 754 | 14 |
| Supplemental data | 321 | 31 |
| Citation downloads | 90 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,485 | 363 |
| Total Views | 3,848 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.