Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Efficacious genome editing in infant mice with glycogen storage disease type Ia
Benjamin Arnson, Ekaterina Ilich, Troy von Beck, Songtao Li, Elizabeth D. Brooks, Dorothy Gheorghiu, Gordon He, Matthew Weinrub, Sze Ying Chan, Hye-Ri Kang, David Courtney, Jeffrey I. Everitt, Bryan R. Cullen, Dwight D. Koeberl
Benjamin Arnson, Ekaterina Ilich, Troy von Beck, Songtao Li, Elizabeth D. Brooks, Dorothy Gheorghiu, Gordon He, Matthew Weinrub, Sze Ying Chan, Hye-Ri Kang, David Courtney, Jeffrey I. Everitt, Bryan R. Cullen, Dwight D. Koeberl
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Genetics Therapeutics

Efficacious genome editing in infant mice with glycogen storage disease type Ia

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Glycogen storage disease type Ia (GSD Ia) is caused by a deficiency of glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) in the liver leading to lethal hypoglycemia. Gene therapy with adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors encoding G6Pase fails to stably treat GSD Ia early in life. We evaluated genome editing in 12-day-old infant mice with GSD Ia using 2 AAV vectors, one containing Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes and a second Donor vector that expresses a guide RNA and a G6PC transgene. Gene therapy with the Donor vector only was compared with genome editing using both Donor and CRISPR vectors. Treatment with genome editing (total vector dose 0.2 × 1013 to 2 × 1013 vector genomes/kg) and bezafibrate (to stimulate autophagy) was efficacious, as assessed by hypoglycemia prevention and the frequency of transgene integration, which correlated with improved survival. This therapy achieved 5.9% chromosomal transgene integration through homology-directed repair, which surpassed a threshold to prevent long-term hepatic complications. No integration was detected in the absence of the CRISPR vector. Importantly for safety, CRISPR vector genomes were depleted, and no intact, integrated CRISPR genomes were detected by long-read sequencing. Thus, genome editing warrants further development as a potentially stable treatment for human infants with GSD Ia.

Authors

Benjamin Arnson, Ekaterina Ilich, Troy von Beck, Songtao Li, Elizabeth D. Brooks, Dorothy Gheorghiu, Gordon He, Matthew Weinrub, Sze Ying Chan, Hye-Ri Kang, David Courtney, Jeffrey I. Everitt, Bryan R. Cullen, Dwight D. Koeberl

×

Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through April 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 2,209 106
PDF 545 35
Figure 309 0
Supplemental data 256 14
Citation downloads 140 0
Totals 3,459 155
Total Views 3,614

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts