Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Efficacious genome editing in infant mice with glycogen storage disease type Ia
Benjamin Arnson, Ekaterina Ilich, Troy von Beck, Songtao Li, Elizabeth D. Brooks, Dorothy Gheorghiu, Gordon He, Matthew Weinrub, Sze Ying Chan, Hye-Ri Kang, David Courtney, Jeffrey I. Everitt, Bryan R. Cullen, Dwight D. Koeberl
Benjamin Arnson, Ekaterina Ilich, Troy von Beck, Songtao Li, Elizabeth D. Brooks, Dorothy Gheorghiu, Gordon He, Matthew Weinrub, Sze Ying Chan, Hye-Ri Kang, David Courtney, Jeffrey I. Everitt, Bryan R. Cullen, Dwight D. Koeberl
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Genetics Therapeutics

Efficacious genome editing in infant mice with glycogen storage disease type Ia

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Glycogen storage disease type Ia (GSD Ia) is caused by a deficiency of glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) in the liver leading to lethal hypoglycemia. Gene therapy with adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors encoding G6Pase fails to stably treat GSD Ia early in life. We evaluated genome editing in 12-day-old infant mice with GSD Ia using 2 AAV vectors, one containing Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes and a second Donor vector that expresses a guide RNA and a G6PC transgene. Gene therapy with the Donor vector only was compared with genome editing using both Donor and CRISPR vectors. Treatment with genome editing (total vector dose 0.2 × 1013 to 2 × 1013 vector genomes/kg) and bezafibrate (to stimulate autophagy) was efficacious, as assessed by hypoglycemia prevention and the frequency of transgene integration, which correlated with improved survival. This therapy achieved 5.9% chromosomal transgene integration through homology-directed repair, which surpassed a threshold to prevent long-term hepatic complications. No integration was detected in the absence of the CRISPR vector. Importantly for safety, CRISPR vector genomes were depleted, and no intact, integrated CRISPR genomes were detected by long-read sequencing. Thus, genome editing warrants further development as a potentially stable treatment for human infants with GSD Ia.

Authors

Benjamin Arnson, Ekaterina Ilich, Troy von Beck, Songtao Li, Elizabeth D. Brooks, Dorothy Gheorghiu, Gordon He, Matthew Weinrub, Sze Ying Chan, Hye-Ri Kang, David Courtney, Jeffrey I. Everitt, Bryan R. Cullen, Dwight D. Koeberl

×

Figure 5

Quantification of indels, HDR, and off-target effects.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Quantification of indels, HDR, and off-target effects.
(A) PCR detection...
(A) PCR detection of integrated G6PC transgene, in comparison with a standard curve from purified integration PCR fragment in mouse genomic DNA. (B) Surveyor assay for CRISPR vector–treated mice. Arrows indicate bands for indels. WT is negative control. Cytosine-guanine (C+G) control for the Surveyor shows approximately 50% cleavage. Histograms show mean ± SD. **P < 0.01 as determined by a t test. (C) Off-target effects determined by NGS of predicted sites with 2 and 3 differences from the guide sequence from 5 treated mice in the High Donor + CRISPR + Beza group and from an untreated control mouse.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts