Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Efficacious genome editing in infant mice with glycogen storage disease type Ia
Benjamin Arnson, Ekaterina Ilich, Troy von Beck, Songtao Li, Elizabeth D. Brooks, Dorothy Gheorghiu, Gordon He, Matthew Weinrub, Sze Ying Chan, Hye-Ri Kang, David Courtney, Jeffrey I. Everitt, Bryan R. Cullen, Dwight D. Koeberl
Benjamin Arnson, Ekaterina Ilich, Troy von Beck, Songtao Li, Elizabeth D. Brooks, Dorothy Gheorghiu, Gordon He, Matthew Weinrub, Sze Ying Chan, Hye-Ri Kang, David Courtney, Jeffrey I. Everitt, Bryan R. Cullen, Dwight D. Koeberl
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Genetics Therapeutics

Efficacious genome editing in infant mice with glycogen storage disease type Ia

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Glycogen storage disease type Ia (GSD Ia) is caused by a deficiency of glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) in the liver leading to lethal hypoglycemia. Gene therapy with adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors encoding G6Pase fails to stably treat GSD Ia early in life. We evaluated genome editing in 12-day-old infant mice with GSD Ia using 2 AAV vectors, one containing Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes and a second Donor vector that expresses a guide RNA and a G6PC transgene. Gene therapy with the Donor vector only was compared with genome editing using both Donor and CRISPR vectors. Treatment with genome editing (total vector dose 0.2 × 1013 to 2 × 1013 vector genomes/kg) and bezafibrate (to stimulate autophagy) was efficacious, as assessed by hypoglycemia prevention and the frequency of transgene integration, which correlated with improved survival. This therapy achieved 5.9% chromosomal transgene integration through homology-directed repair, which surpassed a threshold to prevent long-term hepatic complications. No integration was detected in the absence of the CRISPR vector. Importantly for safety, CRISPR vector genomes were depleted, and no intact, integrated CRISPR genomes were detected by long-read sequencing. Thus, genome editing warrants further development as a potentially stable treatment for human infants with GSD Ia.

Authors

Benjamin Arnson, Ekaterina Ilich, Troy von Beck, Songtao Li, Elizabeth D. Brooks, Dorothy Gheorghiu, Gordon He, Matthew Weinrub, Sze Ying Chan, Hye-Ri Kang, David Courtney, Jeffrey I. Everitt, Bryan R. Cullen, Dwight D. Koeberl

×

Figure 3

Correction of hypoglycemia.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Correction of hypoglycemia.
Blood glucose after 8 hours fasting performe...
Blood glucose after 8 hours fasting performed (A) 2 weeks and (B) 11 weeks following vector administration. Blood glucose determined at (C) baseline after a 4-hour fast, and (D) at 120 minutes after dextrose administration. (E) Blood lactate determined 12 weeks following vector administration without fasting. Groups were as follows: WT (n = 8), High Donor + CRISPR (n = 6), High Donor (n = 6), High Donor + CRISPR + Beza (n = 7), High Donor + Beza (n = 7), Low Donor +CRISPR + Beza (n = 8), and Low Donor + Beza (n = 6). Individual values and mean are shown. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001 compared with High Donor + CRISPR + Beza group as determined by 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts