Usage Information
Abstract
Apoptosis and necroptosis are 2 distinct destinies of cells stimulated with TNF-α; however, it remains unclear how apoptosis and necroptosis are differentially regulated. This study validates the key regulatory role of speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) in balancing apoptosis and necroptosis. SPOP promotes the polyubiquitination and degradation of receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 3 (RIPK3), thereby inhibiting necrosome formation and decreasing cellular sensitivity to necroptosis. Conversely, SPOP interacted with RIPK1 independently of its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, protecting it from ubiquitination and degradation, thereby enhancing RIPK1 expression and cellular sensitivity to apoptosis. Inhibiting RIPK1 kinase activity with 7-Cl-O-Nec-1 impeded both SPOP-mediated apoptosis and SPOP deficiency–mediated necroptosis. Besides, inhibition or loss of RIPK3 rescued SPOP deficiency–mediated necroptosis. Pancancer analyses indicated that the SPOP/RIPK1/RIPK3 axis is dysfunctional in a variety of tumors. In 3 representative tumor types with high expression of SPOP and RIPK1, kidney renal clear cell carcinoma, liver hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast invasive carcinoma, this regulatory mechanism remains applicable. Based on these findings, a combination therapy using the second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases (Smac) mimetic SM164 and sunitinib was developed, demonstrating a more pronounced efficacy than sunitinib monotherapy, and this sensitizing effect was dependent on the expression level of RIPK1. These results suggest that the combination of Smac mimetics with tyrosine kinase inhibitors holds potential clinical value for tumors with dysregulated SPOP/RIPK1/RIPK3 signaling.
Authors
Yuzhong Ye, Changjie Yue, Zaosong Zheng, Hailong Ruan, Yuanpeng Zhang, Qi Miao, Xiaoping Zhang, Wen Xiao, Lei Liu
Usage data is cumulative from October 2025 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,974 | 329 |
| 546 | 66 | |
| Figure | 1,216 | 7 |
| Supplemental data | 453 | 3 |
| Citation downloads | 313 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,502 | 405 |
| Total Views | 5,907 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
