Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
SPOP mediates apoptosis and protects against necroptosis by regulating ubiquitination of RIPK1 and RIPK3
Yuzhong Ye, Changjie Yue, Zaosong Zheng, Hailong Ruan, Yuanpeng Zhang, Qi Miao, Xiaoping Zhang, Wen Xiao, Lei Liu
Yuzhong Ye, Changjie Yue, Zaosong Zheng, Hailong Ruan, Yuanpeng Zhang, Qi Miao, Xiaoping Zhang, Wen Xiao, Lei Liu
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Oncology

SPOP mediates apoptosis and protects against necroptosis by regulating ubiquitination of RIPK1 and RIPK3

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Apoptosis and necroptosis are 2 distinct destinies of cells stimulated with TNF-α; however, it remains unclear how apoptosis and necroptosis are differentially regulated. This study validates the key regulatory role of speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) in balancing apoptosis and necroptosis. SPOP promotes the polyubiquitination and degradation of receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 3 (RIPK3), thereby inhibiting necrosome formation and decreasing cellular sensitivity to necroptosis. Conversely, SPOP interacted with RIPK1 independently of its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, protecting it from ubiquitination and degradation, thereby enhancing RIPK1 expression and cellular sensitivity to apoptosis. Inhibiting RIPK1 kinase activity with 7-Cl-O-Nec-1 impeded both SPOP-mediated apoptosis and SPOP deficiency–mediated necroptosis. Besides, inhibition or loss of RIPK3 rescued SPOP deficiency–mediated necroptosis. Pancancer analyses indicated that the SPOP/RIPK1/RIPK3 axis is dysfunctional in a variety of tumors. In 3 representative tumor types with high expression of SPOP and RIPK1, kidney renal clear cell carcinoma, liver hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast invasive carcinoma, this regulatory mechanism remains applicable. Based on these findings, a combination therapy using the second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases (Smac) mimetic SM164 and sunitinib was developed, demonstrating a more pronounced efficacy than sunitinib monotherapy, and this sensitizing effect was dependent on the expression level of RIPK1. These results suggest that the combination of Smac mimetics with tyrosine kinase inhibitors holds potential clinical value for tumors with dysregulated SPOP/RIPK1/RIPK3 signaling.

Authors

Yuzhong Ye, Changjie Yue, Zaosong Zheng, Hailong Ruan, Yuanpeng Zhang, Qi Miao, Xiaoping Zhang, Wen Xiao, Lei Liu

×

Figure 1

SPOP deficiency protects against apoptosis and mediates necroptosis.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
SPOP deficiency protects against apoptosis and mediates necroptosis.
(A)...
(A) SPOP+/+ and SPOP–/– MEFs were treated with DMSO or TSZ for 4 hours and then treated with MTS for 2 hours; subsequently we measured absorbance with fluorescent plate reader. (B) SPOP+/+ and SPOP–/– MEFs were treated with DMSO or T5z7 for 4 hours and then treated with MTS for 2 hours; subsequently we measured absorbance with fluorescent plate reader. (C) Images of SPOP+/+ and SPOP–/– MEFs pretreated with DMSO or Nec-1s or GSK872 for 1 hour and then treated with DMSO or TSZ or TSZ + Nec-1s or TSZ + GSK872 for 4 hours. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) SPOP+/+ and SPOP–/– MEFs were pretreated with DMSO or Nec-1s or GSK872 for 1 hour and then treated with DMSO or TSZ or TSZ + Nec-1s or TSZ + GSK872 for 4 hours and then treated with MTS for 2 hours; subsequently we measured absorbance with fluorescent plate reader. (E) Images of SPOP+/+RIPK3+/+, SPOP+/+RIPK3–/–, SPOP–/–RIPK3+/+, and SPOP–/–RIPK3–/– MEFs treated with DMSO or TSZ or 4 hours. Scale bar, 100 μm. (F) SPOP+/+RIPK3+/+, SPOP+/+RIPK3–/–, SPOP–/–RIPK3+/+, and SPOP–/–RIPK3–/– MEFs treated with DMSO or TSZ or 4 hours and then treated with MTS for 2 hours; subsequently we measured absorbance with fluorescent plate reader. (G) Images of SPOP+/+ and SPOP–/– MEFs pretreated with DMSO or Nec-1s for 1 hour and then treated with DMSO or T5z7 or T5z7 + Nec-1s for 6 hours. Scale bar, 100 μm. (H) SPOP+/+ and SPOP–/– MEFs pretreated with DMSO or Nec-1s for 1 hour and treated with DMSO or T5z7 or T5z7 + Nec-1s for 6 hours, then treated with MTS for 2 hours; subsequently we measured absorbance with fluorescent plate reader. Experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated 3 times independently. Data are presented as mean ± SD. The significance of differences was revealed based on unpaired Student’s t test (***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts