Usage Information
Abstract
The deleterious consequences of chronic synovitis on cartilage, tendon, and bone in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are well described. In contrast, its effects on periarticular skeletal muscle are under-studied. Furthermore, while TNF inhibition is an effective therapy for RA synovitis, it exacerbates fibrosis in muscle injury models. We aimed to investigate whether myositis and muscle fibrosis are features of inflammatory arthritis and evaluate whether targeted RA therapies influence these disease features. Periarticular muscle was analyzed in murine models of poly- and monoarticular inflammatory arthritis: serum transfer–induced arthritis, collagen-induced arthritis, K/BxN, and antigen-induced arthritis (AIA). Periarticular myositis and an increase in muscle fibroadipocyte progenitors (FAPs) were observed in all models, despite diverse arthritogenic mechanisms. Periarticular muscle fibrosis was observed from day 15 in AIA. Neither etanercept nor baricitinib suppressed periarticular myositis or subsequent fibrosis compared to vehicle, despite reducing arthritis. Notably, etanercept failed to prevent muscle fibrosis even when initiated early, but this was not linked to increased FAP survival or collagen production. Corroborating these data, radiographic and histological analyses revealed periarticular myositis in patients with RA. We conclude that periarticular myositis and fibrosis are under-recognized features of inflammatory arthritis. Targeted RA therapies may not prevent periarticular muscle sequelae, despite controlling arthritis.
Authors
Jessica Day, Cynthia Louis, Kristy Swiderski, Angus Stock, Huon Wong, Wentao Yao, Bonnia Liu, Suba Nadesapillai, Gordon S. Lynch, Ian P. Wicks
Usage data is cumulative from May 2025 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,138 | 359 |
| 270 | 44 | |
| Figure | 687 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 187 | 13 |
| Citation downloads | 132 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,414 | 416 |
| Total Views | 3,830 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
