Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
CD11c+ CD8 T cells cause IFN-γ–dependent autoimmune neuroinflammation that is restrained by PD-1 signaling
Daniel Hwang, Gholamreza Azizi, Larissa Lumi Watanabe Ishikawa, Maryam Seyedsadr, Arin Cox, Soohwa Jang, Ezgi Kasimoglu, Abdolmohamad Rostami, Guang-Xian Zhang, Bogoljub Ciric
Daniel Hwang, Gholamreza Azizi, Larissa Lumi Watanabe Ishikawa, Maryam Seyedsadr, Arin Cox, Soohwa Jang, Ezgi Kasimoglu, Abdolmohamad Rostami, Guang-Xian Zhang, Bogoljub Ciric
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Neuroscience

CD11c+ CD8 T cells cause IFN-γ–dependent autoimmune neuroinflammation that is restrained by PD-1 signaling

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

In multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions, CD8 T cells outnumber CD4 T cells, suggesting that they contribute to MS pathology. However, little is known about the role of CD8 T cells in MS, partly due to the prevalent use of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) models mediated by CD4 T cells, which have limited involvement of CD8 T cells. Importantly, MS and EAE differ in both their distribution of CNS lesions and neurologic deficits, indicating differences in CNS inflammation. MS lesions are more commonly found in the brain, whereas EAE lesions are more frequent in the spinal cord. Additionally, neurologic deficits in MS rarely parallel the ascending paralysis typical for CD4 T cell–mediated EAE (CD4-EAE). In contrast, CD8-EAE models suggest that CD8 T cells preferentially cause brain inflammation; however, little is known about how brain and spinal cord inflammation may differ, or how CD8 T cells contribute to these differences. We have established an adoptive CD8-EAE mouse model characterized by brain-centered inflammation, ataxia, and weight loss. CNS inflammation in the brain and spinal cord differed in immune cell numbers, cellular composition, and inflammatory signatures. CD8-EAE could be suppressed by blocking IFN-γ, and exacerbated by blocking PD-1, with concomitant changes in the numbers of CNS-infiltrating monocytes. Most CD8 T cells in the CNS were CD11c+, suggesting that they are the pathogenic subset. We describe a robust CD8-EAE model, identify differences between brain and spinal cord inflammation, and characterize mechanisms that control CD8 T cell–mediated neuroinflammation, thereby furthering understanding of EAE and MS.

Authors

Daniel Hwang, Gholamreza Azizi, Larissa Lumi Watanabe Ishikawa, Maryam Seyedsadr, Arin Cox, Soohwa Jang, Ezgi Kasimoglu, Abdolmohamad Rostami, Guang-Xian Zhang, Bogoljub Ciric

×

Figure 8

Blocking IFN-γ suppresses CD8-EAE.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Blocking IFN-γ suppresses CD8-EAE.
CD8-EAE was induced by transfer of 2 ...
CD8-EAE was induced by transfer of 2 × 107 CD8 T cells cultured in Tc1 conditions for 3 days, before being rested/expanded for 3 days before transfer. (A) Clinical scores and change in weight for CD8-EAE mice treated with 200 mg/day anti–IFN-γ mAb or control IgG; n = 8 per group, with data compiled from 2 experiments. The right panel shows clinical scores from a second independent experiment in which mice developed fulminant disease and were treated with either anti–IFN-γ or control IgG. n = 4 per group. Significance was determined by 2-way ANOVA. (B) Numbers of CD45+ cells isolated from the brain and spinal cord on day 7 after transfer; n = 5–8 per group compiled from 2 experiments. (C) t-SNE clustering of CD45+ cells isolated from the brain and spinal cord. CD8+ T cells were defined as CD45+CD8+; MoDCs and MFs as D45hiCD11b+Ly6Glo/–Ly6C+MHCII+, neutrophils as CD45hiCD11b+Ly6GhiLy6CInt; monocytes as CD45hiCD11b+Ly6Glo/–Ly6C+MHCII–; microglia as CD45loCD11b+; and CD4 T cells as CD45hiCD4+. B cells were defined as CD45+CD19+CD4–CD8–. Other CD11b+ cells were defined as CD45+CD11b+ cells that did not express other markers. Other CD45+ cells did not express other lineage markers stained in this panel. (D) Quantification of the frequency of cell populations from C among CD45+ cells in the brain and spinal cord.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts