Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
CD11c+ CD8 T cells cause IFN-γ–dependent autoimmune neuroinflammation that is restrained by PD-1 signaling
Daniel Hwang, Gholamreza Azizi, Larissa Lumi Watanabe Ishikawa, Maryam Seyedsadr, Arin Cox, Soohwa Jang, Ezgi Kasimoglu, Abdolmohamad Rostami, Guang-Xian Zhang, Bogoljub Ciric
Daniel Hwang, Gholamreza Azizi, Larissa Lumi Watanabe Ishikawa, Maryam Seyedsadr, Arin Cox, Soohwa Jang, Ezgi Kasimoglu, Abdolmohamad Rostami, Guang-Xian Zhang, Bogoljub Ciric
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Neuroscience

CD11c+ CD8 T cells cause IFN-γ–dependent autoimmune neuroinflammation that is restrained by PD-1 signaling

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

In multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions, CD8 T cells outnumber CD4 T cells, suggesting that they contribute to MS pathology. However, little is known about the role of CD8 T cells in MS, partly due to the prevalent use of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) models mediated by CD4 T cells, which have limited involvement of CD8 T cells. Importantly, MS and EAE differ in both their distribution of CNS lesions and neurologic deficits, indicating differences in CNS inflammation. MS lesions are more commonly found in the brain, whereas EAE lesions are more frequent in the spinal cord. Additionally, neurologic deficits in MS rarely parallel the ascending paralysis typical for CD4 T cell–mediated EAE (CD4-EAE). In contrast, CD8-EAE models suggest that CD8 T cells preferentially cause brain inflammation; however, little is known about how brain and spinal cord inflammation may differ, or how CD8 T cells contribute to these differences. We have established an adoptive CD8-EAE mouse model characterized by brain-centered inflammation, ataxia, and weight loss. CNS inflammation in the brain and spinal cord differed in immune cell numbers, cellular composition, and inflammatory signatures. CD8-EAE could be suppressed by blocking IFN-γ, and exacerbated by blocking PD-1, with concomitant changes in the numbers of CNS-infiltrating monocytes. Most CD8 T cells in the CNS were CD11c+, suggesting that they are the pathogenic subset. We describe a robust CD8-EAE model, identify differences between brain and spinal cord inflammation, and characterize mechanisms that control CD8 T cell–mediated neuroinflammation, thereby furthering understanding of EAE and MS.

Authors

Daniel Hwang, Gholamreza Azizi, Larissa Lumi Watanabe Ishikawa, Maryam Seyedsadr, Arin Cox, Soohwa Jang, Ezgi Kasimoglu, Abdolmohamad Rostami, Guang-Xian Zhang, Bogoljub Ciric

×

Figure 6

Blocking PD-1 signaling exacerbates CD8-EAE.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Blocking PD-1 signaling exacerbates CD8-EAE.
Recipient mice received 8.8...
Recipient mice received 8.8 T cells and were treated daily with 200 μg aPD-1 or isotype mAb (Rat IgG2a) starting from the day of CD8-EAE induction (n = 7–8 mice per group; compiled from 3 independent experiments). (A) Clinical scores and the number of inflamed eyes over time are shown. Statistical significance was determined by 2-way ANOVA. (B) Incidence of eye inflammation in mice treated with aPD-1 or isotype mAb. Significance was determined by the χ2 test. (C) Number of CD45+ cells from the brain and spinal cord of mice treated with aPD-1 and sacrificed on day 8 after CD8-EAE induction. (D) t-SNE clustering of CD45+ cells from multicolor flow cytometry data. CD8+ T cells were defined as CD8+CD3+; microglia as CD11b+Sall1+; MoDCs and macrophages as Sall1–CD11b+Ly6Glo/–Ly6C+MHCII+; neutrophils as Sall1–CD11b+Ly6GhiLy6CInt; CD4 T cells as CD4+CD3+. Other CD45hi cells did not express lineage markers stained in this panel. MHCII– monocytes were Sall1–CD11b+Ly6Glo/–Ly6C+MHCII–; Ly6C– APCs were Sall1–CD11b+Ly6C–MHCII+; other CD11b+ cells did not express Sall1, Ly6C, Ly6G, and MHCII. (E) Quantification of cell numbers based on gating from D. (F) Histograms depicting expression of PD-1 among cell populations. For C–F, statistical significance was determined by a 2-tailed unpaired t test.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts