Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
YAP/TAZ mediates resistance to KRAS inhibitors through inhibiting proapoptosis and activating the SLC7A5/mTOR axis
Wang Yang, … , Jiuwei Cui, Xin Zhou
Wang Yang, … , Jiuwei Cui, Xin Zhou
Published December 20, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(24):e178535. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.178535.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology Therapeutics

YAP/TAZ mediates resistance to KRAS inhibitors through inhibiting proapoptosis and activating the SLC7A5/mTOR axis

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

KRAS mutations are frequent in various human cancers. The development of selective inhibitors targeting KRAS mutations has opened a new era for targeted therapy. However, intrinsic and acquired resistance to these inhibitors remains a major challenge. Here, we found that cancer cells resistant to KRAS G12C inhibitors also display cross-resistance to other targeted therapies, such as inhibitors of RTKs or SHP2. Transcriptomic analyses revealed that the Hippo-YAP/TAZ pathway is activated in intrinsically resistant and acquired-resistance cells. Constitutive activation of YAP/TAZ conferred resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors, while knockdown of YAP/TAZ or TEADs sensitized resistant cells to these inhibitors. This scenario was also observed in KRAS G12D–mutant cancer cells. Mechanistically, YAP/TAZ protects cells from KRAS inhibitor–induced apoptosis by downregulating the expression of proapoptotic genes such as BMF, BCL2L11, and PUMA, and YAP/TAZ reverses KRAS inhibitor–induced proliferation retardation by activating the SLC7A5/mTORC1 axis. We further demonstrated that dasatinib and MYF-03-176 notably enhance the efficacy of KRAS inhibitors by reducing SRC kinase activity and TEAD activity. Overall, targeting the Hippo-YAP/TAZ pathway has the potential to overcome resistance to KRAS inhibitors.

Authors

Wang Yang, Ming Zhang, Tian-Xing Zhang, Jia-Hui Liu, Man-Wei Hao, Xu Yan, Haicheng Gao, Qun-Ying Lei, Jiuwei Cui, Xin Zhou

×

Figure 2

The Hippo-YAP/TAZ pathway is activated in both intrinsic and acquired KRAS G12C inhibitor–resistant cells and is adaptively induced upon KRAS G12C inhibition.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
The Hippo-YAP/TAZ pathway is activated in both intrinsic and acquired KR...
(A) Heatmap displaying the resistance index of ARS1620, AMG510, and MRTX849 across various KRAS G12C–mutant cancer cell lines. (B) Venn diagram illustrating the overlapping relationships among 3 gene sets associated with resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors as in Supplemental Figure 1D. (C) Bar chart presenting the top 10 regulatory factors involved in modulating a set of 134 genes highlighted with white font in B. (D) Network graph visualizing the interplay between these 10 regulatory factors. (E) Quantification of immunofluorescence depicting the subcellular localization of YAP/TAZ in the indicated cells as in Supplemental Figure 2A. (F) Box-and-whisker plots (bulk RNA-seq) presenting YAP Lisa scores in parental cells and KRAS G12C inhibitor–resistant cells. (G) Box-and-whisker plot (left, bulk RNA-seq) and ridge plot (right, scRNA-seq) displaying YAP UP scores in H358 cells treated with ARS1620 for the indicated duration. (H) tSNE plots showing single-cell clustering (left) and YAP UP scores (right) in H358 cells treated with ARS1620 for indicated durations. (I) Immunoblots demonstrating changes in YAP/TAZ and ERK phosphorylation levels in intrinsically resistant cells (H2030, SW1573) before and after AMG510 treatment, and following the withdrawal of the drug. (J and K) Immunoblots (J) and line graph (K) illustrating the temporal dynamics of YAP phosphorylation in sensitive cells (H358) and resistant cells (SW1573) in response to AMG510 treatment. Data were analyzed using Student’s t test (F) or 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons (G). Blots provided together were set up in parallel at the same time (I and J).

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts