IFN-signaling gene (ISG) expression scores are potential markers of inflammation with significance from cancer to genetic syndromes. In Aicardi Goutières Syndrome (AGS), a disorder of abnormal DNA and RNA metabolism, this score has potential as a diagnostic biomarker, although the approach to ISG calculation has not been standardized or validated. To optimize ISG calculation and validate ISG as a diagnostic biomarker, mRNA levels of 36 type I IFN response genes were quantified from 997 samples (including 334 AGS), and samples were randomized into training and test data sets. An independent validation cohort (n = 122) was also collected. ISGs were calculated using all potential combinations up to 6 genes. A 4-gene approach (IFI44L, IFI27, USP18, IFI6) was the best-performing model (AUC of 0.8872 [training data set], 0.9245 [test data set]). The majority of top-performing gene combinations included IFI44L. Performance of IFI44L alone was 0.8762 (training data set) and 0.9580 (test data set) by AUC. The top approaches were able to discriminate individuals with genetic interferonopathy from control samples. This study validates the context of use for the ISG score as a diagnostic biomarker and underscores the importance of IFI44L in diagnosis of genetic interferonopathies.
Laura A. Adang, Russell D’Aiello, Asako Takanohashi, Sarah Woidill, Francesco Gavazzi, Edward M. Behrens, Kathleen E. Sullivan, Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky, Adriana A. de Jesus, AGS Clinical Trial Readiness Workgroup, Adeline Vanderver, Justine Shults
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 2,346 | 404 |
533 | 80 | |
Figure | 292 | 0 |
Table | 102 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 137 | 15 |
Citation downloads | 77 | 0 |
Totals | 3,487 | 499 |
Total Views | 3,986 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.