Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Molecular and cellular context influences SCN8A variant function
Carlos G. Vanoye, Tatiana V. Abramova, Jean-Marc DeKeyser, Nora F. Ghabra, Madeleine J. Oudin, Christopher B. Burge, Ingo Helbig, Christopher H. Thompson, Alfred L. George Jr.
Carlos G. Vanoye, Tatiana V. Abramova, Jean-Marc DeKeyser, Nora F. Ghabra, Madeleine J. Oudin, Christopher B. Burge, Ingo Helbig, Christopher H. Thompson, Alfred L. George Jr.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Genetics Neuroscience

Molecular and cellular context influences SCN8A variant function

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Pathogenic variants in SCN8A, which encodes the voltage-gated sodium (NaV) channel NaV1.6, associate with neurodevelopmental disorders, including developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Previous approaches to determine SCN8A variant function may be confounded by use of a neonatally expressed, alternatively spliced isoform of NaV1.6 (NaV1.6N) and engineered mutations rendering the channel tetrodotoxin (TTX) resistant. We investigated the impact of SCN8A alternative splicing on variant function by comparing the functional attributes of 15 variants expressed in 2 developmentally regulated splice isoforms (NaV1.6N, NaV1.6A). We employed automated patch clamp recording to enhance throughput, and developed a neuronal cell line (ND7/LoNav) with low levels of endogenous NaV current to obviate the need for TTX-resistance mutations. Expression of NaV1.6N or NaV1.6A in ND7/LoNav cells generated NaV currents with small, but significant, differences in voltage dependence of activation and inactivation. TTX-resistant versions of both isoforms exhibited significant functional differences compared with the corresponding WT channels. We demonstrated that many of the 15 disease-associated variants studied exhibited isoform-dependent functional effects, and that many of the studied SCN8A variants exhibited functional properties that were not easily classified as either gain- or loss-of-function. Our work illustrates the value of considering molecular and cellular context when investigating SCN8A variants.

Authors

Carlos G. Vanoye, Tatiana V. Abramova, Jean-Marc DeKeyser, Nora F. Ghabra, Madeleine J. Oudin, Christopher B. Burge, Ingo Helbig, Christopher H. Thompson, Alfred L. George Jr.

×

Figure 3

Current density of NaV1.6 variants.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Current density of NaV1.6 variants.
(A) Peak whole-cell current density ...
(A) Peak whole-cell current density for NaV1.6 variants displayed as fold difference from WT channels recorded in parallel. All individual data points are plotted as open symbols and mean values are shown as larger filled symbols (n = 35–108 per variant). Error bars represent 95% CI. Data from NaV1.6A or NaV1.6N are indicated as red or blue symbols, respectively. Values to the right or left of the vertical dashed line (normalized WT value) represent current density larger or smaller than WT, respectively. (B) Averaged current traces, normalized to WT peak current density, for WT NaV1.6N and select variants with either larger (G1475R) or smaller (Q417P) current density. (C) Volcano plot of mean values highlighting variants with peak current density significantly (P < 0.01, horizontal dashed line) different from WT. Symbols to the left of the vertical dashed line denote smaller current (loss of function, LoF), while symbols to the right indicate larger current (gain of function, GoF). Black symbols represent variants with no significant difference from WT. Quantitative data with statistical comparisons are provided in Supplemental Data Set 2 (NaV1.6N) and Supplemental Data Set 3 (NaV1.6A).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts