Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Immunological landscape of human lymphoid explants during measles virus infection
Joshua A. Acklin, … , Benhur Lee, Jean K. Lim
Joshua A. Acklin, … , Benhur Lee, Jean K. Lim
Published September 10, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(17):e172261. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.172261.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Infectious disease Virology

Immunological landscape of human lymphoid explants during measles virus infection

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

In humans, lymph nodes are the primary site of measles virus (MeV) replication. To understand the immunological events that occur at this site, we infected human lymphoid tissue explants using a pathogenic strain of MeV that expresses GFP. We found that MeV infected 5%–15% of cells across donors. Using single-cell RNA-Seq and flow cytometry, we found that while most of the 29 cell populations identified in the lymphoid culture were susceptible to MeV, there was a broad preferential infection of B cells and reduced infection of T cells. Further subsetting of T cells revealed that this reduction may be driven by the decreased infection of naive T cells. Transcriptional changes in infected B cells were dominated by an interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) signature. To determine which of these ISGs were most substantial, we evaluated the proteome of MeV-infected Raji cells by mass spectrometry. We found that IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, ISG15, CXCL10, MX2, and XAF1 proteins were the most highly induced and positively correlated with their expression in the transcriptome. These data provide insight into the immunological events that occur in lymph nodes during infection and may lead to the development of therapeutic interventions.

Authors

Joshua A. Acklin, Aum R. Patel, Andrew P. Kurland, Shu Horiuchi, Arianna S. Moss, Emma J. DeGrace, Satoshi Ikegame, Jillian Carmichael, Shreyas Kowdle, Patricia A. Thibault, Naoko Imai, Hideki Ueno, Benjamin Tweel, Jeffrey R. Johnson, Brad R. Rosenberg, Benhur Lee, Jean K. Lim

×

Figure 3

MeV preferentially infects B cells and is restricted among naive T cells.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
MeV preferentially infects B cells and is restricted among naive T cells...
Cells from MeV-GFP–infected and donor-matched uninfected tissues were collected at days 3, 6, and 8 after infection and were then immunophenotyped by flow cytometry (n = 3; gating schemata in A, E, I, and O). The frequency of CD19+ B cells (B) and CD3+ T cells (C) among all CD45+ cells are quantified and compared over time for GFP+ cells, GFP– bystander cells, and donor-matched uninfected controls. The geometric mean fluorescence intensity (gMFI) of surface CD150 among CD19+ and CD3+ cells is compared (D). Susceptibility to infection among CD4+ (F) and CD8+ (G) populations is shown, with CD150 expression compared between populations (H). Naive (CD45RA+CCR7+), TCM (CD45+CCR7–), TEM (CD45RA–CCR7–), and TEMRA (CD45RA+CCR7–) populations are quantified and compared among CD4+ cells (I–M) and CD8+ cells (O–S). CD150 expression is compared among CD4+ (N) and CD8+ (T) subpopulations. For all immunophenotyping panels, significance was determined by 2-way ANOVA using the Geisser-Greenhouse correction with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. For panels D and H, significance was determined by Wilcoxon’s matched pairs signed rank test. For panels N and T, significance was determined by 1-way ANOVA using Friedman’s test with Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. For all plots, the median and the 95% confidence interval are shown.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts