Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Molecular mechanism responsible for sex differences in electrical activity of mouse pancreatic β cells
Noelia Jacobo-Piqueras, Tamara Theiner, Stefanie M. Geisler, Petronel Tuluc
Noelia Jacobo-Piqueras, Tamara Theiner, Stefanie M. Geisler, Petronel Tuluc
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Endocrinology

Molecular mechanism responsible for sex differences in electrical activity of mouse pancreatic β cells

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

In humans, type 2 diabetes mellitus shows a higher prevalence in men compared with women, a phenotype that has been attributed to a lower peripheral insulin sensitivity in men. Whether sex-specific differences in pancreatic β cell function also contribute is largely unknown. Here, we characterized the electrophysiological properties of β cells in intact male and female mouse islets. Elevation of glucose concentration above 5 mM triggered an electrical activity with a similar glucose dependence in β cells of both sexes. However, female β cells had a more depolarized membrane potential and increased firing frequency compared with males. The higher membrane depolarization in female β cells was caused by approximately 50% smaller Kv2.1 K+ currents compared with males but otherwise unchanged KATP, large-conductance and small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels, and background TASK1/TALK1 K+ current densities. In female β cells, the higher depolarization caused a membrane potential–dependent inactivation of the voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (CaV), resulting in reduced Ca2+ entry. Nevertheless, this reduced Ca2+ influx was offset by a higher action potential firing frequency. Because exocytosis of insulin granules does not show a sex-specific difference, we conclude that the higher electrical activity promotes insulin release in females, improving glucose tolerance.

Authors

Noelia Jacobo-Piqueras, Tamara Theiner, Stefanie M. Geisler, Petronel Tuluc

×

Figure 6

Vesicle exocytosis is similar in male and female β cells, but the incretin pathway shows a sex difference.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Vesicle exocytosis is similar in male and female β cells, but the incret...
(A) Average trace of the β cell capacitance increase after a train of 10 depolarizing steps (500-ms steps from –70 mV to 0 mV) from male (black, n = 15; 3 mice) and female (red, n = 19; 3 mice) mice. (B) Scatter plot of the increase in capacitance after the first depolarization, corresponding to the readily releasable pool (RRP, left) and the maximal exocytosis (right). (C) Dynamic insulin release from male (n = 10) and female (n = 9) islets (20 islets/experiment) in 2, 5, and 10 mM glucose (G). (D) Same as in A but in the presence of 1 nM GLP-1. (E) Dynamic insulin release in 2, 5, and 10 mM glucose plus 1 nM GLP-1 and 100 nM Gq inhibitor YM-254890. (F) Scatter plot of the peak insulin release in the presence of 10 mM glucose, 1 nM GLP-1, and 100 nM YM-254890. All values are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 by 2-tailed Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney test (F).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts