The expression and functional relevance of the gap junction molecule connexin-45 (Cx45; GJC1) in lymphatic endothelium were not previously known. We found that Cx45 was expressed widely in the endothelium of murine lymphatics, in both valve and nonvalve regions. Cell-specific deletion of Cx45, driven by a constitutive Cre line (Lyve1-Cre) or an inducible Cre line (Prox1-CreERT2), compromised the function of lymphatic valves, as assessed by physiological tests (back leak and closure) of isolated, single-valve vessel segments. The defects were comparable to those previously reported for loss of Cx43, and as with Cx43, deletion of Cx45 resulted in shortening or increased asymmetry of lymphatic valve leaflets, providing an explanation for the compromised valve function. In contrast with Cx43, lymphatic endothelial cell–specific (LEC-specific) deletion of Cx45 did not alter the number of valves in mesenteric or dermal lymphatic networks or the expression patterns of the canonical valve-associated proteins PROX1, ITGA9, or CLAUDIN5. Constitutive deletion of Cx45 from LECs resulted in increased backflow of injected tracer in popliteal networks in vivo and compromised the integrity of the LEC permeability barrier in a subset of collecting vessels. These findings provide evidence for an unexpected role of Cx45 in the development and maintenance of lymphatic valves.
Michael J. Davis, Jorge A. Castorena-Gonzalez, Min Li, Scott D. Zawieja, Alex M. Simon, Xin Geng, R. Sathish Srinivasan
Usage data is cumulative from July 2024 through December 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,316 | 56 |
509 | 25 | |
Figure | 293 | 7 |
Table | 29 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 219 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 48 | 0 |
Totals | 2,414 | 90 |
Total Views | 2,504 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.