Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Individual transcriptomic response to strength training for patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1
Emily E. Davey, Cécilia Légaré, Lori Planco, Sharon Shaughnessy, Claudia D. Lennon, Marie-Pier Roussel, Hannah K. Shorrock, Man Hung, John Douglas Cleary, Elise Duchesne, J. Andrew Berglund
Emily E. Davey, Cécilia Légaré, Lori Planco, Sharon Shaughnessy, Claudia D. Lennon, Marie-Pier Roussel, Hannah K. Shorrock, Man Hung, John Douglas Cleary, Elise Duchesne, J. Andrew Berglund
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Muscle biology Therapeutics

Individual transcriptomic response to strength training for patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), the most common form of adult-onset muscular dystrophy, is caused by a CTG expansion resulting in significant transcriptomic dysregulation that leads to muscle weakness and wasting. While strength training is clinically beneficial in DM1, molecular effects had not been studied. To determine whether training rescued transcriptomic defects, RNA-Seq was performed on vastus lateralis samples from 9 male patients with DM1 before and after a 12-week strength-training program and 6 male controls who did not undergo training. Differential gene expression and alternative splicing analysis were correlated with the one-repetition maximum strength evaluation method (leg extension, leg press, hip abduction, and squat). While training program–induced improvements in splicing were similar among most individuals, rescued splicing events varied considerably between individuals. Gene expression improvements were highly varied between individuals, and the percentage of differentially expressed genes rescued after training were strongly correlated with strength improvements. Evaluating transcriptome changes individually revealed responses to the training not evident from grouped analysis, likely due to disease heterogeneity and individual exercise response differences. Our analyses indicate that transcriptomic changes are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with DM1 undergoing training and that these changes are often specific to the individual and should be analyzed accordingly.

Authors

Emily E. Davey, Cécilia Légaré, Lori Planco, Sharon Shaughnessy, Claudia D. Lennon, Marie-Pier Roussel, Hannah K. Shorrock, Man Hung, John Douglas Cleary, Elise Duchesne, J. Andrew Berglund

×

Figure 4

Individual transcriptomic improvements in Mikhail et al. aerobic cycling training data.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Individual transcriptomic improvements in Mikhail et al. aerobic cycling...
Reanalysis of Mikhail et al cycling training (25) RNA-Seq data via individual analysis approach. (A) Number of skipped exon events rescued, overrescued, or misrescued after the cycling training program (ΔPSI > |0.05|,FDR < 0.05, P < 0.0002) for each participant. Rescued (purple), 10% < PSI < 110%; overrescued (red), PSI ≥ 110% control; misrescued (green), PSI < –10% opposite direction of control. Rescued events unique to individual are indicated with light purple. (B) Individual (black/gray) and grouped (red/pink) pre- and posttraining splicing dysregulation scores. Splicing dysregulation scores are quantified as the average absolute ΔPSI of all events significantly misspliced prior to the strength-training program. (C) Heatmap of a panel of 46 skipped exon events that are good predictors of [MBNL]inferred levels (28) for participants with smallest (sample 6), median (sample 13), and greatest (samples 3 and 4) baseline FEV1 values. Statistically significant rescued (blue shading), not rescued (red shading), and not statistically significant (gray shading) events are illustrated. (D) Number of DEGs rescued, overrescued, or misrescued after aerobic training. Rescue was calculated as: (log2FC Pre-Post/log2FC Pre-Control) × 100. (E) Pre- and posttraining DGE dysregulation scores for each individual, as well as individuals grouped together. PSI, percent spliced in; DEGs:,differentially expressed genes; DGE, differential gene expression; 1-RM, 1 repetition maximum.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts