Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(20):e156742. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.156742.
Abstract
Biased agonism is a frontier field in GPCR research. Acquired hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (AHH) is a rare disease caused by calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) autoantibodies, to date, showing either simple blocking or biased properties (i.e., stimulatory or blocking effects on different downstream signaling pathways). This emphasizes the importance of the Gi/o (pertussis toxin–sensitive G proteins, whose βγ subunits activate multiple signals, including ERK1/2) in regulating parathyroid hormone secretion. We here describe 3 patients with symptomatic AHH who shared characteristics with the 2 cases we previously reported as follows: (a) elderly (74–87 years at diagnosis), (b) male, (c) unexpectedly showed no other autoimmune diseases, (d) showed spontaneously fluctuating Ca levels from approximately normal to near fatally high ranges, (e) acute exacerbations could be successfully treated with prednisolone and/or calcimimetics, (f) the presence of CaSR autoantibodies that operated as biased allosteric modulators of CaSR, and (g) were likely to be conformational (i.e., recognizing and, thereby, stabilizing a unique active conformation of CaSR that activates Gq/11, activating phosphatidylinositol turnover, but not Gi/o). Our observations with these prominent commonalities may provide new insights into the phenotype and characteristics of AHH and the mechanisms by which the biased agonism of GPCRs operate.
Authors
Noriko Makita, Junichiro Sato, Katsunori Manaka, Kimiko Akahane, Takahiro Ito, Hajime Yamazaki, Akira Mizoguchi, Yusuke Hikima, Hirofumi Horikoshi, Masaomi Nangaku, Taroh Iiri
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 370 | 148 |
| 66 | 61 | |
| Figure | 160 | 0 |
| Table | 18 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 41 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 40 | 0 |
| Totals | 695 | 209 |
| Total Views | 904 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
