Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Regional variability and genotypic and pharmacodynamic effects on PrP concentration in the CNS
Meredith A. Mortberg, Hien T. Zhao, Andrew G. Reidenbach, Juliana E. Gentile, Eric Kuhn, Jill O’Moore, Patrick M. Dooley, Theresa R. Connors, Curt Mazur, Shona W. Allen, Bianca A. Trombetta, Alison McManus, Matthew R. Moore, Jiewu Liu, Deborah E. Cabin, Holly B. Kordasiewicz, Joel Mathews, Steven E. Arnold, Sonia M. Vallabh, Eric Vallabh Minikel
Meredith A. Mortberg, Hien T. Zhao, Andrew G. Reidenbach, Juliana E. Gentile, Eric Kuhn, Jill O’Moore, Patrick M. Dooley, Theresa R. Connors, Curt Mazur, Shona W. Allen, Bianca A. Trombetta, Alison McManus, Matthew R. Moore, Jiewu Liu, Deborah E. Cabin, Holly B. Kordasiewicz, Joel Mathews, Steven E. Arnold, Sonia M. Vallabh, Eric Vallabh Minikel
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Neuroscience Therapeutics

Regional variability and genotypic and pharmacodynamic effects on PrP concentration in the CNS

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Prion protein (PrP) concentration controls the kinetics of prion replication and is a genetically and pharmacologically validated therapeutic target for prion disease. In order to evaluate PrP concentration as a pharmacodynamic biomarker and assess its contribution to known prion disease risk factors, we developed and validated a plate-based immunoassay reactive for PrP across 6 species of interest and applicable to brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). PrP concentration varied dramatically across different brain regions in mice, cynomolgus macaques, and humans. PrP expression did not appear to contribute to the known risk factors of age, sex, or common PRNP genetic variants. CSF PrP was lowered in the presence of rare pathogenic PRNP variants, with heterozygous carriers of P102L displaying 55%, and D178N just 31%, of the CSF PrP concentration of mutation-negative controls. In rodents, pharmacologic reduction of brain Prnp RNA was reflected in brain parenchyma PrP and, in turn in CSF PrP, validating CSF as a sampling compartment for the effect of PrP-lowering therapy. Our findings support the use of CSF PrP as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for PrP-lowering drugs and suggest that relative reduction from individual baseline CSF PrP concentration may be an appropriate marker for target engagement.

Authors

Meredith A. Mortberg, Hien T. Zhao, Andrew G. Reidenbach, Juliana E. Gentile, Eric Kuhn, Jill O’Moore, Patrick M. Dooley, Theresa R. Connors, Curt Mazur, Shona W. Allen, Bianca A. Trombetta, Alison McManus, Matthew R. Moore, Jiewu Liu, Deborah E. Cabin, Holly B. Kordasiewicz, Joel Mathews, Steven E. Arnold, Sonia M. Vallabh, Eric Vallabh Minikel

×

Figure 3

Effect of PRNP mutation on CSF PrP concentration.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Effect of PRNP mutation on CSF PrP concentration.
(A) CSF PrP concentrat...
(A) CSF PrP concentrations measured by cross-species ELISA, averaged across all available CSF samples for each of n = 47 MGH study participants, normalized to the mean of non-mutation carrier controls. Bars indicate mean and 95% confidence interval of the mean. Red dashed line indicates lower limit of quantification (LLQ). This sample set includes n = 29 individuals for which CSF PrP concentrations determined by BetaPrion ELISA were previously reported (11). (B) The same samples analyzed by the PrP MRM assay, peptides arranged from N-terminal (left) to C-terminal (right). Peptide sequences and residue numbers are noted beneath each plot. Because observations with technical replicate CVs greater than 15%, were removed, the number of samples differs for each panel. Bars indicate mean and 95% confidence interval of the mean. (C) Correlation between ELISA results from (A) (x axis) and MRM results from (B) (y axis), with lines indicating a diagonal with slope = 1 (gray) and 0.5 (pink, GENFTETDVK only). In (B and C), red boxes indicate individuals whose mutation abolishes the tryptic peptide being monitored in that plot.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts