Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Endothelium-protective, histone-neutralizing properties of the polyanionic agent defibrotide
Hui Shi, … , James H. Morrissey, Jason S. Knight
Hui Shi, … , James H. Morrissey, Jason S. Knight
Published July 15, 2021
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2021;6(17):e149149. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.149149.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Inflammation Vascular biology

Endothelium-protective, histone-neutralizing properties of the polyanionic agent defibrotide

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Neutrophil-mediated activation and injury of the endothelium play roles in the pathogenesis of diverse disease states ranging from autoimmunity to cancer to COVID-19. Neutralization of cationic proteins (such as neutrophil extracellular trap–derived [NET-derived] histones) with polyanionic compounds has been suggested as a potential strategy for protecting the endothelium from such insults. Here, we report that the US Food and Drug Administration–approved polyanionic agent defibrotide (a pleiotropic mixture of oligonucleotides) directly engages histones and thereby blocks their pathological effects on endothelium. In vitro, defibrotide counteracted endothelial cell activation and pyroptosis-mediated cell death, whether triggered by purified NETs or recombinant histone H4. In vivo, defibrotide stabilized the endothelium and protected against histone-accelerated inferior vena cava thrombosis in mice. Mechanistically, defibrotide demonstrated direct and tight binding to histone H4 as detected by both electrophoretic mobility shift assay and surface plasmon resonance. Taken together, these data provide insights into the potential role of polyanionic compounds in protecting the endothelium from thromboinflammation with potential implications for myriad NET- and histone-accelerated disease states.

Authors

Hui Shi, Alex A. Gandhi, Stephanie A. Smith, Qiuyu Wang, Diane Chiang, Srilakshmi Yalavarthi, Ramadan A. Ali, Chao Liu, Gautam Sule, Pei-Suen Tsou, Yu Zuo, Yogendra Kanthi, Evan A. Farkash, Jiandie D. Lin, James H. Morrissey, Jason S. Knight

×

Figure 6

Defibrotide protects HUVECs from histone H4–mediated pyroptosis.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Defibrotide protects HUVECs from histone H4–mediated pyroptosis.
(A and ...
(A and B) HUVECs were treated with histone H4 (100 μg/mL) ± defibrotide (20 μg/mL) for 4 hours. The concentrations of IL-1β (A) and IL-18 (B) were determined in supernatants (n = 6 independent experiments); ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA corrected by Dunnett’s test. Data were presented as mean ± SD. (C) Immunoblotting detection of activated gasdermin D (GSDMD) and caspase 3 in cell lysates. HUVECs were treated with histone H4 (100 μg/mL) or staurosporine (50 nM) for 6 hours before collecting the cell lysates. Con, control; H4, histone H4; stauro, staurosporine. (D and E) HUVECs were treated as in A and B, and HMGB1 translocation (D) and secretion (E) were determined by microscopy and supernatant ELISA, respectively (n = 3 independent experiments); ****P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA corrected by Dunnett’s test. Scale bars: 100 μm (primary image) and 10 μm (inset). Data were presented as mean ± SD.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts