Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Identification of a series of hair-cell MET channel blockers that protect against aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity
Emma J. Kenyon, Nerissa K. Kirkwood, Siân R. Kitcher, Richard J. Goodyear, Marco Derudas, Daire M. Cantillon, Sarah Baxendale, Antonio de la Vega de León, Virginia N. Mahieu, Richard T. Osgood, Charlotte Donald Wilson, James C. Bull, Simon J. Waddell, Tanya T. Whitfield, Simon E. Ward, Corné J. Kros, Guy P. Richardson
Emma J. Kenyon, Nerissa K. Kirkwood, Siân R. Kitcher, Richard J. Goodyear, Marco Derudas, Daire M. Cantillon, Sarah Baxendale, Antonio de la Vega de León, Virginia N. Mahieu, Richard T. Osgood, Charlotte Donald Wilson, James C. Bull, Simon J. Waddell, Tanya T. Whitfield, Simon E. Ward, Corné J. Kros, Guy P. Richardson
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Neuroscience Therapeutics

Identification of a series of hair-cell MET channel blockers that protect against aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

To identify small molecules that shield mammalian sensory hair cells from the ototoxic side effects of aminoglycoside antibiotics, 10,240 compounds were initially screened in zebrafish larvae, selecting for those that protected lateral-line hair cells against neomycin and gentamicin. When the 64 hits from this screen were retested in mouse cochlear cultures, 8 protected outer hair cells (OHCs) from gentamicin in vitro without causing hair-bundle damage. These 8 hits shared structural features and blocked, to varying degrees, the OHC’s mechano-electrical transducer (MET) channel, a route of aminoglycoside entry into hair cells. Further characterization of one of the strongest MET channel blockers, UoS-7692, revealed it additionally protected against kanamycin and tobramycin and did not abrogate the bactericidal activity of gentamicin. UoS-7692 behaved, like the aminoglycosides, as a permeant blocker of the MET channel; significantly reduced gentamicin–Texas red loading into OHCs; and preserved lateral-line function in neomycin-treated zebrafish. Transtympanic injection of UoS-7692 protected mouse OHCs from furosemide/kanamycin exposure in vivo and partially preserved hearing. The results confirmed the hair-cell MET channel as a viable target for the identification of compounds that protect the cochlea from aminoglycosides and provide a series of hit compounds that will inform the design of future otoprotectants.

Authors

Emma J. Kenyon, Nerissa K. Kirkwood, Siân R. Kitcher, Richard J. Goodyear, Marco Derudas, Daire M. Cantillon, Sarah Baxendale, Antonio de la Vega de León, Virginia N. Mahieu, Richard T. Osgood, Charlotte Donald Wilson, James C. Bull, Simon J. Waddell, Tanya T. Whitfield, Simon E. Ward, Corné J. Kros, Guy P. Richardson

×

Figure 10

UoS-7692 preserves larval movement in neomycin-treated zebrafish.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
UoS-7692 preserves larval movement in neomycin-treated zebrafish.
(A) Bo...
(A) Box-and-whisker plots showing movement of 5 dpf zebrafish larvae after treatment with E3 medium, 6.25 μM neomycin, or 25 μM UoS-7692 and 6.25 μM neomycin, followed by washout. Circles show individual larvae with independent experiments grouped by color (n = 3). (B) Images of example neuromasts labeled with YO-PRO-1 after treatment with E3 medium (top), 6.25 μM neomycin (middle), or 25 M UoS-7692 and 6.25 μM neomycin (bottom) after behavioral testing. Scale bar: 20 μm. (C) Box-and-whisker plots showing movement of 5 dpf zebrafish after treatment with either E3 medium or 25 μM UoS-7692 alone followed by washout. Circles show individual larvae with independent experiments grouped by color (n = 4). Black line shows median, gray boxes span the IQR, and whiskers extend over points within additional 1.5 × IQR. Neomycin compared with control larvae P = 0.029, neomycin and UoS-7692 compared with control larvae P = 0.3947, neomycin and UoS-7692 compared with neomycin alone larvae P = 0.0153 (Dunn’s post hoc tests). UoS-7692 alone compared with control larvae t = 0.552, df = 126, P = 0.58 using a 2-sample t test. *P < 0.05.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts