Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Anti-TIGIT differentially affects sepsis survival in immunologically experienced versus previously naive hosts
Yini Sun, Jerome C. Anyalebechi, He Sun, Tetsuya Yumoto, Ming Xue, Danya Liu, Zhe Liang, Craig M. Coopersmith, Mandy L. Ford
Yini Sun, Jerome C. Anyalebechi, He Sun, Tetsuya Yumoto, Ming Xue, Danya Liu, Zhe Liang, Craig M. Coopersmith, Mandy L. Ford
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Infectious disease Inflammation

Anti-TIGIT differentially affects sepsis survival in immunologically experienced versus previously naive hosts

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests that the balance of T cell costimulatory and coinhibitory signals contributes to mortality during sepsis. Here, we identified a critical role of the coinhibitory molecule T cell Ig and ITIM domain (TIGIT) in regulating sepsis mortality. Because TIGIT is significantly upregulated on memory T cells, we developed a “memory mouse” model to study the role of TIGIT during sepsis in a more physiologically relevant context. Mice received sequential pathogen exposure and developed memory T cell frequencies, similar to those observed in adult humans, and were then subjected to sepsis induction via cecal ligation and puncture. Our results show that targeting the TIGIT pathway during sepsis is fundamentally different in previously naive versus memory mice, in that αTIGIT Ab had no effect on survival in previously naive septic mice but sharply worsened survival in memory septic mice. Mechanistically, αTIGIT increased apoptosis of memory T cells, decreased T cell function, and downregulated the costimulatory receptor DNAM on memory CD8+ T cells in memory septic mice, but not in previously naive septic mice. Additionally, αTIGIT diminished Helios expression in Tregs in memory but not previously naive septic mice. These data highlight fundamental differences in the pathophysiological impact of targeting TIGIT in immunologically experienced versus previously naive hosts during sepsis.

Authors

Yini Sun, Jerome C. Anyalebechi, He Sun, Tetsuya Yumoto, Ming Xue, Danya Liu, Zhe Liang, Craig M. Coopersmith, Mandy L. Ford

×

Figure 5

Memory CD8+ T cells exhibit decreased DNAM expression in αTIGIT-treated memory mice relative to memory controls.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Memory CD8+ T cells exhibit decreased DNAM expression in αTIGIT-treated ...
Memory and naive mice were subjected to CLP and received 2 doses of αTIGIT Ab or isotype control at 12 and 24 hours after CLP. Spleens were harvested at 48 hours after CLP and DNAM expression on T cells was assessed by flow cytometry. (A and B) Representative flow histograms and summary data depicting DNAM expression on CD44hiCD4+ and CD44loCD4+ T cells. (C and D) Representative flow histograms and summary figure depicting DNAM MFI of CD44hiCD8+ and CD44loCD8+ T cells, n = 8–10 in each group. Groups were compared using 1-way ANOVA analysis and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts