Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2021;6(4):e140180. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.140180.
Abstract
Hepatocellular death contributes to progression of alcohol–associated (ALD-associated) and non–alcohol-associated (NAFL/NASH) liver diseases. However, receptor-interaction protein kinase 3 (RIP3), an intermediate in necroptotic cell death, contributes to injury in murine models of ALD but not NAFL/NASH. We show here that a differential role for mixed-lineage kinase domain–like protein (MLKL), the downstream effector of RIP3, in murine models of ALD versus NAFL/NASH and that RIP1-RIP3-MLKL can be used as biomarkers to distinguish alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) from NASH. Phospho-MLKL was higher in livers of patients with NASH compared with AH or healthy controls (HCs). MLKL expression, phosphorylation, oligomerization, and translocation to plasma membrane were induced in WT mice fed diets high in fat, fructose, and cholesterol but not in response to Gao-binge (acute on chronic) ethanol exposure. Mlkl–/– mice were not protected from ethanol-induced hepatocellular injury, which was associated with increased expression of chemokines and neutrophil recruitment. Circulating concentrations of RIP1 and RIP3, but not MLKL, distinguished patients with AH from HCs or patients with NASH. Taken together, these data indicate that MLKL is differentially activated in ALD/AH compared with NAFL/NASH in both murine models and patients. Furthermore, plasma RIP1 and RIP3 may be promising biomarkers for distinguishing AH and NASH.
Authors
Tatsunori Miyata, Xiaoqin Wu, Xiude Fan, Emily Huang, Carlos Sanz-Garcia, Christina K. Cajigas-Du Ross, Sanjoy Roychowdhury, Annette Bellar, Megan R. McMullen, Jaividhya Dasarathy, Daniela S. Allende, Joan Caballeria, Pau Sancho-Bru, Craig J. McClain, Mack Mitchell, Arthur J. McCullough, Svetlana Radaeva, Bruce Barton, Gyongyi Szabo, Srinivasan Dasarathy, Laura E. Nagy
Usage data is cumulative from February 2021 through April 2021.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 538 | 0 |
| 164 | 0 | |
| Figure | 93 | 0 |
| Table | 13 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 14 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 3 | 0 |
| Totals | 825 | 0 |
| Total Views | 825 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
