Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Mutations of CNTNAP1 led to defects in neuronal development
Wanxing Li, … , Zilong Qiu, Wenhao Zhou
Wanxing Li, … , Zilong Qiu, Wenhao Zhou
Published November 5, 2020
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2020;5(21):e135697. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.135697.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Genetics Neuroscience

Mutations of CNTNAP1 led to defects in neuronal development

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Mutations of CNTNAP1 were associated with myelination disorders, suggesting the role of CNTNAP1 in myelination processes. Whether CNTNAP1 may have a role in early cortical neuronal development is largely unknown. In this study, we identified 4 compound heterozygous mutations of CNTNAP1 in 2 Chinese families. Using mouse models, we found that CNTNAP1 is highly expressed in neurons and is located predominantly in MAP2+ neurons during the early developmental stage. Importantly, Cntnap1 deficiency results in aberrant dendritic growth and spine development in vitro and in vivo, and it delayed migration of cortical neurons during early development. Finally, we found that the number of parvalbumin+ neurons in the cortex and hippocampus of Cntnap1–/– mice is strikingly increased by P15, suggesting that excitation/inhibition balance is impaired. Together, this evidence elucidates a critical function of CNTNAP1 in cortical development, providing insights underlying molecular and circuit mechanisms of CNTNAP1-related disease.

Authors

Wanxing Li, Lin Yang, Chuanqing Tang, Kaiyi Liu, Yulan Lu, Huijun Wang, Kai Yan, Zilong Qiu, Wenhao Zhou

×

Figure 5

Cntnap1 regulates dendritic arborization in vitro.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint

Cntnap1 regulates dendritic arborization in vitro.
(A and B) Quantifica...
(A and B) Quantification of the total axon length and the number of terminals of neurons transfected with the indicated constructs (214 and 89 neurons from each group were randomly selected and measured.). All data were collected from 3 independent experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated by Student’s t test. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. For the quantification of total axon length, P = 0.0736; for number of terminals, P = 0.1163. (C) Representative images of 8DIV and 12DIV cultured neurons transfected with the indicated plasmids. The constructs were transfected at 1DIV using Lipofectamine 2000 and immunolabeled with anti-GFP at 8DIV and 12DIV. Scale bar: 50 μm. (D and E) Quantification of the total dendrite length and the number of terminals of 8DIV and 12DIV neurons transfected with the indicated constructs. For 8DIV, 37, 36, and 36 neurons from each group were randomly selected and measured. Statistical significance was evaluated by 1-way ANOVA. For total dendritic length, *P = 0.0354; for the quantification of dendritic terminals, **P = 0.0069 and *P = 0.0171. For 12DIV, 29, 27, and 29 neurons from each group were randomly selected and measured. Statistical significance was evaluated by 1-way ANOVA. ***P = 0.0001, **P = 0.0016, and *P = 0.02. All data were collected from 3 independent experiments. (F and G) Quantification of the dendritic branching of neurons collected at 8DIV (F) and 12DIV (G), as determined by Sholl analysis (30 and 38 neurons from each group were randomly selected and measured). P = 0.1234 (ns); ****P < 0.0001, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05. Statistical significance was evaluated by 2-way ANOVA, Data are shown as mean ± SEM. All data mentioned above were collected from 3 independent experiments

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts