Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Genomic analysis of benign prostatic hyperplasia implicates cellular relandscaping in disease pathogenesis
Lance W. Middleton, Zhewei Shen, Sushama Varma, Anna S. Pollack, Xue Gong, Shirley Zhu, Chunfang Zhu, Joseph W. Foley, Sujay Vennam, Robert T. Sweeney, Karen Tu, Jewison Biscocho, Okyaz Eminaga, Rosalie Nolley, Robert Tibshirani, James D. Brooks, Robert B. West, Jonathan R. Pollack
Lance W. Middleton, Zhewei Shen, Sushama Varma, Anna S. Pollack, Xue Gong, Shirley Zhu, Chunfang Zhu, Joseph W. Foley, Sujay Vennam, Robert T. Sweeney, Karen Tu, Jewison Biscocho, Okyaz Eminaga, Rosalie Nolley, Robert Tibshirani, James D. Brooks, Robert B. West, Jonathan R. Pollack
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Oncology

Genomic analysis of benign prostatic hyperplasia implicates cellular relandscaping in disease pathogenesis

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms in men. Current treatments target prostate physiology rather than BPH pathophysiology and are only partially effective. Here, we applied next-generation sequencing to gain insight into BPH. By RNA-Seq, we uncovered transcriptional heterogeneity among BPH cases, where a 65-gene BPH stromal signature correlated with symptom severity. Stromal signaling molecules bone morphogenetic protein 5 (BMP5) and CXC chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13) were enriched in BPH while estrogen-regulated pathways were depleted. Notably, BMP5’s addition to cultured prostatic myofibroblasts altered their expression profile toward a BPH profile that included the BPH stromal signature. RNA-Seq also suggested an altered cellular milieu in BPH, which we verified by immunohistochemistry and single-cell RNA-Seq. In particular, BPH tissues exhibited enrichment of myofibroblast subsets but also depletion of neuroendocrine cells and an estrogen receptor–positive fibroblast cell type residing near the epithelium. By whole-exome sequencing, we uncovered somatic single-nucleotide variants in BPH, of uncertain pathogenic significance but indicative of clonal cell expansions. Thus, genomic characterization of BPH has identified a clinically relevant stromal signature and new candidate disease pathways (including a likely role for BMP5 signaling) and reveals BPH to be not merely a hyperplasia, but rather a fundamental relandscaping of cell types.

Authors

Lance W. Middleton, Zhewei Shen, Sushama Varma, Anna S. Pollack, Xue Gong, Shirley Zhu, Chunfang Zhu, Joseph W. Foley, Sujay Vennam, Robert T. Sweeney, Karen Tu, Jewison Biscocho, Okyaz Eminaga, Rosalie Nolley, Robert Tibshirani, James D. Brooks, Robert B. West, Jonathan R. Pollack

×

Figure 1

BPH transcriptional landscape and clinically relevant stromal signature.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
BPH transcriptional landscape and clinically relevant stromal signature....
(A) Heatmap of unsupervised clustering of normal prostate, BPH, and BPH stromal nodules (samples color coded) across the 2548 most variably expressed genes. Transcript levels (median-centered log2 reads per kilobase million values) are indicated by color key. Select gene features (clusters) are annotated based on the expression of characteristic marker genes, including a stroma/myofibroblast feature (enframed on the heatmap) enriched in BPH over normal prostate and heterogeneous among BPH cases. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) panel indicates genes more highly expressed in laser microdissected BPH epithelium (orange) or BPH stroma (purple). The graph illustrates correlation of gene expression features (moving average 51 genes) with BPH IPSS and Bother Score. Note: peak correlations reside within the core stromal feature. The data set corresponding to the heatmap is available as Supplemental Table 2. (B) High expression of a 65-gene stromal signature is associated with elevated IPSS (strong trend) and Bother Score. Mean (red) and SD (blue) shown; P values generated from 2-tailed Student’s t test. The 65 genes correspond to the core of the stromal gene feature (indicated in A), with high expression defined as the top 50%. (C) A similarly derived 57-gene AR/Secretory signature showed no association with IPSS or Bother Score.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts