Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Coordination of ENT2-dependent adenosine transport and signaling dampens mucosal inflammation
Carol M. Aherne, … , Michael R. Blackburn, Holger K. Eltzschig
Carol M. Aherne, … , Michael R. Blackburn, Holger K. Eltzschig
Published October 18, 2018
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2018;3(20):e121521. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.121521.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Gastroenterology

Coordination of ENT2-dependent adenosine transport and signaling dampens mucosal inflammation

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Intestinal epithelial barrier repair is vital for remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Extracellular adenosine signaling has been implicated in promoting restoration of epithelial barrier function. Currently, no clinically approved agents target this pathway. Adenosine signaling is terminated by uptake from the extracellular space via equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENTs). We hypothesized that ENT inhibition could dampen intestinal inflammation. Initial studies demonstrated transcriptional repression of ENT1 and ENT2 in IBD biopsies or in murine IBD models. Subsequent studies in mice with global Ent1 or Ent2 deletion revealed selective protection of Ent2–/– mice. Elevated intestinal adenosine levels in conjunction with abolished protection following pharmacologic blockade of A2B adenosine receptors implicate adenosine signaling as the mechanism of gut protection in Ent2–/– mice. Additional studies in mice with tissue-specific deletion of Ent2 uncovered epithelial Ent2 as the target. Moreover, intestinal protection provided by a selective Ent2 inhibitor was abolished in mice with epithelium-specific deletion of Ent2 or the A2B adenosine receptor. Taken together, these findings indicate that increased mucosal A2B signaling following repression or deletion of epithelial Ent2 coordinates the resolution of intestinal inflammation. This study suggests the presence of a targetable purinergic network within the intestinal epithelium designed to limit tissue inflammation.

Authors

Carol M. Aherne, Colm B. Collins, Caroline R. Rapp, Kristine E. Olli, Loni Perrenoud, Paul Jedlicka, Jessica L. Bowser, Tingting W. Mills, Harry Karmouty-Quintana, Michael R. Blackburn, Holger K. Eltzschig

×

Figure 9

Genetic or pharmacologic Ent2 inhibition does not affect neutrophil migration or increase IL-10 expression in DSS colitis.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Genetic or pharmacologic Ent2 inhibition does not affect neutrophil migr...
Matched Ent2-deficient mice (Ent2–/–) or WT controls (Ent2+/+, mice on a B6/129 background) were exposed to DSS (A and C), or C57BL/6 WT mice were treated with soluflazine (Ent2 inhibitor, 7.7 μg/kg, Alzet pump) or vehicle 1 day prior to exposure to DSS for 7 days (B and D). Following sacrifice, colons were harvested. (A and B) Whole colon was homogenized and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity measured by specific ELISA. (C and D) Whole colon was placed in cell culture media for 24 hours (C, ex vivo culture) or whole colon was homogenized (D). Media from ex vivo culture or tissue lysate were loaded onto a Meso Scale assay plate for specific detection of mouse IL-10. Data in A, B, and C are presented relative to tissue weight. Data in D are relative to protein concentration as determined by BCA. Data represent 7–8 mice per group (A), 8 mice per group (B), 7–9 mice per group (C), and 10 mice per group (D), from 1 independent experiment. Results are displayed as mean ± SEM. Unpaired Student’s t test was used to test for statistical changes. *P < 0.05.

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts