Submit a comment
Abstract
Pharmacological rescue of F508del-CFTR by the triple combination CFTR modulator therapy elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) leads to unprecedented clinical benefits in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, previous studies in CF primary human airway epithelial cultures demonstrated that chronic treatment with the potentiator ivacaftor can render the F508del protein unstable, thus limiting restoration of CFTR chloride channel function. Even so, quantitative studies of this unwanted effect of ivacaftor on F508del channel function with dependency on cell culture conditions remain limited, and the impact of chronic ivacaftor exposure on restoration of mucociliary clearance that is impaired in patients with CF has not been studied. In patient-derived primary nasal epithelial cultures, we found that different culture conditions (UNC-ALI medium vs. PneumaCult medium) have profound effects on ETI-mediated restoration of F508del-CFTR function. Chronic treatment with ivacaftor as part of ETI triple therapy limited the rescue of F508del-CFTR chloride channel function when CF nasal epithelial cultures were grown in UNC-ALI medium but not in PneumaCult medium. In PneumaCult medium, both chronic and acute addition of ivacaftor as part of ETI treatment led to constitutive CFTR-mediated chloride secretion in the absence of exogenous cAMP-dependent stimulation. This constitutive CFTR-mediated chloride secretion was essential to improve viscoelastic properties of the mucus layer and to restore mucociliary transport on CF nasal epithelial cultures. Furthermore, nasal potential difference measurements in patients with CF showed that ETI restored constitutive F508del-CFTR activity in vivo. These results demonstrate that ivacaftor as a component of ETI therapy is essential to restore mucociliary clearance and suggest that this effect is facilitated by its constitutive activation of F508del channels following their folding correction in patients with CF.
Authors
Anita Balázs, Tihomir Rubil, Christine K. Wong, Jasmin Berger, Marika Drescher, Kathrin Seidel, Mirjam Stahl, Simon Y. Graeber, Marcus A. Mall
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
