Submit a comment
Abstract
Mutations on genes encoding polycystin-1 (PC1) and PC2 cause autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease. How these 2 proteins work together to exert anticystogenesis remains elusive. PC1 resembles adhesion G-protein coupled receptors and undergoes autocleavage in the extracellular N-terminus to expose a hidden “stalk” region, which is hypothesized to act as a “tethered agonist.” Here, we show that WT PC1 and PC2 formed functional heteromeric channel complexes in Xenopus oocytes with different biophysical properties from PC2 homomeric channels. Deletion of PC1 N-terminus, which exposed the stalk, increased calcium permeability in PC1/PC2 heteromers that required the presence of stalk. Extracellular application of synthetic stalk peptide increased calcium permeation in stalkless PC1/PC2. Application of Wnt9B protein increased calcium permeability in PC1/PC2 but not in heteromers containing cleavage-resistant mutant PC1. Wnt9B interacted with N-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) of PC1. Pretreatment with LRR blunted the increase in calcium permeability by Wnt9B. Thus, PC1 and PC2 form receptor-channel complexes that is activated by exposure of the stalk region following ligand binding to the PC1 N-terminus. The stalk peptide acts as a tethered agonist to activate PC1/PC2 by affecting ion selectivity of the complexes.
Authors
Runping Wang, Danish Idrees, Mohammad Amir, Biswajit Padhy, Jian Xie, Chou-Long Huang
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
