Submit a comment
Abstract
Rift Valley fever (RVF) is an emerging arboviral disease affecting both humans and livestock. In humans, RVF displays a spectrum of clinical manifestations, including encephalitis. To date, there are no FDA-approved vaccines or therapeutics for human use, although several are in preclinical development. Few small-animal models of RVF encephalitis exist, further complicating countermeasure assessment. Human mAbs RVFV-140, RVFV-268, and RVFV-379 are recombinant potently neutralizing antibodies that prevent infection by binding the RVFV surface glycoproteins. Previous studies showed that both RVFV-268 and RVFV-140 improve survival in a lethal mouse model of disease, and RVFV-268 has prevented vertical transmission in a pregnant rat model of infection. Despite these successes, evaluation of mAbs in the context of brain disease has been limited. This is the first study to our knowledge to assess neutralizing antibodies for prevention of RVF neurologic disease using a rat model. Administration of RVFV-140, RVFV-268, or RVFV-379 24 hours prior to aerosol exposure to the virulent ZH501 strain of RVFV resulted in substantially enhanced survival and lack of neurological signs of disease. These results using a stringent and highly lethal aerosol infection model support the potential use of human mAbs to prevent the development of RVF encephalitis.
Authors
Kaleigh A. Connors, Nathaniel S. Chapman, Cynthia M. McMillen, Ryan M. Hoehl, Jackson J. McGaughey, Zachary D. Frey, Morgan Midgett, Connor Williams, Douglas S. Reed, James E. Crowe Jr., Amy L. Hartman
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
