Submit a comment
Abstract
Immune therapy is the new frontier of cancer treatment. Therapeutic radiation is a known inducer of immune response and can be limited by immunosuppressive mediators including cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) that is highly expressed in aggressive triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). A clinical cohort of TNBC tumors revealed poor radiation therapeutic efficacy in tumors expressing high COX2. Herein, we show that radiation combined with adjuvant NSAID (indomethacin) treatment provides a powerful combination to reduce both primary tumor growth and lung metastasis in aggressive 4T1 TNBC tumors, which occurs in part through increased antitumor immune response. Spatial immunological changes including augmented lymphoid infiltration into the tumor epithelium and locally increased cGAS/STING1 and type I IFN gene expression were observed in radiation-indomethacin–treated 4T1 tumors. Thus, radiation and adjuvant NSAID treatment shifts “immune desert phenotypes” toward antitumor M1/TH1 immune mediators in these immunologically challenging tumors. Importantly, radiation-indomethacin combination treatment improved local control of the primary lesion, reduced metastatic burden, and increased median survival when compared with radiation treatment alone. These results show that clinically available NSAIDs can improve radiation therapeutic efficacy through increased antitumor immune response and augmented local generation of cGAS/STING1 and type I IFNs.
Authors
Lisa A. Ridnour, Robert Y.S. Cheng, Noemi Kedei, Veena Somasundaram, Dibyangana D. Bhattacharyya, Debashree Basudhar, Adelaide L. Wink, Abigail J. Walke, Caleb Kim, William F. Heinz, Elijah F. Edmondson, Donna O. Butcher, Andrew C. Warner, Tiffany H. Dorsey, Milind Pore, Robert J. Kinders, Stanley Lipkowitz, Richard J. Bryant, Jens Rittscher, Stephen T.C. Wong, Stephen M. Hewitt, Jenny C. Chang, Aliaa Shalaby, Grace M. Callagy, Sharon A. Glynn, Stefan Ambs, Stephen K. Anderson, Daniel W. McVicar, Stephen J. Lockett, David A. Wink
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
