Submit a comment
Abstract
A hallmark of chronic bacterial infections is the long-term persistence of 1 or more pathogen species at the compromised site. Repeated detection of the same bacterial species can suggest that a single strain or lineage is continually present. However, infection with multiple strains of a given species, strain acquisition and loss, and changes in strain relative abundance can occur. Detecting strain-level changes and their effects on disease is challenging because most methods require labor-intensive isolate-by-isolate analyses, and thus, only a few cells from large infecting populations can be examined. Here, we present a population-level method for enumerating and measuring the relative abundance of strains called population multi-locus sequence typing (PopMLST). The method exploits PCR amplification of strain-identifying polymorphic loci, next-generation sequencing to measure allelic variants, and informatic methods to determine whether variants arise from sequencing errors or low-abundance strains. These features enable PopMLST to simultaneously interrogate hundreds of bacterial cells that are cultured en masse from patient samples or are present in DNA directly extracted from clinical specimens without ex vivo culture. This method could be used to detect epidemic or super-infecting strains, facilitate understanding of strain dynamics during chronic infections, and enable studies that link strain changes to clinical outcomes.
Authors
Sarah J. Morgan, Samantha L. Durfey, Sumedha Ravishankar, Peter Jorth, Wendy Ni, Duncan T. Skerrett, Moira L. Aitken, Edward F. McKone, Stephen J. Salipante, Matthew C. Radey, Pradeep K. Singh
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
