In addition to its well-known beneficial effects for the treatment of several types of cancer, PD-1 blockade has shown encouraging results in preclinical models of sepsis and in a recent clinical trial in sepsis. Because cancer is the most common comorbidity in septic patients, here we aimed to determine the efficacy of PD-1 checkpoint blockade in the setting of sepsis complicated with preexisting malignancy. In a model of established lung cancer followed by cecal ligation and puncture–induced (CLP-induced) sepsis, PD-1 blockade exhibited no therapeutic effect on sepsis survival. This diminished efficacy of PD-1 blockade in cancer septic animals (septic animals with cancer) was characterized by a reduction in both the quality and quantity of PD-1+ responder cells. Specifically, CD8+ T cells isolated from cancer septic animals exhibited decreased CD28 expression and a reduction in the CXCR5+PD-1+ subset. In addition, flow cytometric analysis of T cells isolated from cancer septic animals revealed 2B4 as another possible checkpoint under these conditions. Administration of anti-2B4 to cancer septic animals significantly improved sepsis survival and was associated with increased T cell costimulatory receptor expression and decreased coinhibitory receptor expression. These results illustrate functions of coinhibitory receptors in the setting of sepsis complicated with cancer.
Ching-wen Chen, Ming Xue, Wenxiao Zhang, Jianfeng Xie, Craig M. Coopersmith, Mandy L. Ford
Guidelines: The Editorial Board will only consider letters that we deem relevant and of interest to our readers. We will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review, nor will we post letters that are essentially a reiteration of another letter. All accepted letters will be posted on our website within one week of acceptance. We reserve the right to edit any letter for length, content, and clarity. Authors of all accepted letters will be asked to preview any changes. Authors will be notified by e-mail if their letters were not accepted. As this is a final decision, no appeals will be considered.
Specific requirements: All letters must be 400 words or fewer. You may enter the letter as plain text or HTML. The author's name and e-mail address are required, and will be posted with the letter. All possible conflicts of interest must be noted, even if they are not posted. If you wish to include a figure (keep in mind that non-peer-reviewed data will not be posted), please contact the editors directly at firstname.lastname@example.org.