Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D suppresses M1 macrophages and promotes M2 differentiation at bone injury sites
Samiksha Wasnik, … , Kin-Hing William Lau, Xiaolei Tang
Samiksha Wasnik, … , Kin-Hing William Lau, Xiaolei Tang
Published September 6, 2018
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2018;3(17):e98773. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.98773.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Bone biology

1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D suppresses M1 macrophages and promotes M2 differentiation at bone injury sites

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

An indispensable role of macrophages in bone repair has been well recognized. Previous data have demonstrated the copresence of M1 macrophages and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) during the proinflammatory stage of bone repair. However, the exact role of M1 macrophages in MSC function and bone repair is unknown. This study aimed to define the role of M1 macrophages at bone injury sites via the function of 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25[OH]2D) in suppressing M1 but promoting M2 differentiation. We showed that 1,25(OH)2D suppressed M1 macrophage–mediated enhancement of MSC migration. Additionally, 1,25(OH)2D inhibited M1 macrophage secretion of osteogenic proteins (i.e., Oncostatin M, TNF-α, and IL-6). Importantly, the 1,25(OH)2D-mediated suppression of osteogenic function in M1 macrophages at the proinflammatory stage was associated with 1,25(OH)2D-mediated reduction of MSC abundance, compromised osteogenic potential of MSCs, and impairment of fracture repair. Furthermore, outside the proinflammatory stage, 1,25(OH)2D treatment did not suppress fracture repair. Accordingly, our data support 2 conclusions: (a) M1 macrophages are important for the recruitment and osteogenic priming of MSCs and, hence, are necessary for fracture repair, and (b) under vitamin D–sufficient conditions, 1,25(OH)2D treatment is unnecessary and can be detrimental if provided during the proinflammatory stage of fracture healing.

Authors

Samiksha Wasnik, Charles H. Rundle, David J. Baylink, Mohammad Safaie Yazdi, Edmundo E. Carreon, Yi Xu, Xuezhong Qin, Kin-Hing William Lau, Xiaolei Tang

×

Figure 6

Local s.c. treatment with 1,25(OH)2D during the proinflammatory stage suppressed at fracture sites CD11b+F4/80+ macrophage secretion of M1 macrophage–associated molecules that had been shown to promote osteogenesis in MSCs and to be important for fracture repair.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Local s.c. treatment with 1,25(OH)2D during the proinflammatory stage su...
B6 mice were subjected to fracture surgery (Fx), treatments, cell isolation, and analyses as described in Figure 3. The cells from days 1, 4, and 7 were analyzed. Data from day 1 are shown. (A) Representative FACS histograms show the expressions of Oncostatin M (OSM, upper panel), TNF-α (middle panel), and IL-6 (lower panel) in CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages. (B) Left, cumulative data of MFIs of OSM, TNF-α, and IL-6 expressions in CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages. Right, percent of OSMhi, TNF-αhi, and IL-6hi cells among CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, ANOVA, n = 3.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts