Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2017;2(18):e95530. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.95530.
Abstract
Clinical trials in patients with macular edema due to diabetic retinopathy or retinal vein occlusion (RVO) have shown that suppression of VEGF not only improves macular edema, but also reopens closed retinal vessels, prevents progression of vessel closure, and improves retinopathy. In this study, we show the molecular basis for those clinical observations. Increased retinal levels of VEGF in mice cause plugging of retinal vessels with leukocytes, vessel closure, and hypoxia. Suppression of VEGF reduces leukocyte plugging, causing reperfusion of closed vessels. Activation of VEGFR1 contributes to leukocyte recruitment, because it is significantly reduced by an anti-VEGFR1–neutralizing antibody. High VEGF increases transcriptional activity of NF-κB and expression of NF-κB target genes, particularly Vcam1. Injection of an anti-VCAM-1–neutralizing antibody reduces VEGF-induced leukocyte plugging. These data explain the broad range of benefits obtained by VEGF suppression in patients with ischemic retinopathies, provide an important insight into the pathogenesis of RVO and diabetic retinopathy, and suggest that sustained suppression of VEGF early in the course of these diseases may prevent vessel closure, worsening ischemia, and disease progression. This study also identifies VEGFR1 and VCAM-1 as molecular targets whose suppression could supplement VEGF neutralization for treatment of RVO and diabetic retinopathy.
Authors
Yuanyuan Liu, Jikui Shen, Seth D. Fortmann, Jiangxia Wang, Dietmar Vestweber, Peter A. Campochiaro
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 510 | 68 |
| 61 | 29 | |
| Figure | 264 | 9 |
| Supplemental data | 24 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 56 | 0 |
| Totals | 915 | 106 |
| Total Views | 1,021 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
