Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Essential role for CCR6 in certain inflammatory diseases demonstrated using specific antagonist and knockin mice
Remy Robert, Caroline Ang, Guizhi Sun, Laurent Juglair, Ee X. Lim, Linda J. Mason, Natalie L. Payne, Claude C.A. Bernard, Charles R. Mackay
Remy Robert, Caroline Ang, Guizhi Sun, Laurent Juglair, Ee X. Lim, Linda J. Mason, Natalie L. Payne, Claude C.A. Bernard, Charles R. Mackay
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Therapeutics

Essential role for CCR6 in certain inflammatory diseases demonstrated using specific antagonist and knockin mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The chemokine receptor CCR6 marks subsets of T cells and innate lymphoid cells that produce IL-17 and IL-22, and as such may play a role in the recruitment of these cells to certain inflammatory sites. However, the precise role of CCR6 has been controversial, in part because no effective monoclonal antibody (mAb) inhibitors against this receptor exist for use in mouse models of inflammation. We circumvented this problem using transgenic mice expressing human CCR6 (hCCR6) under control of its native promoter (hCCR6-Tg/mCCR6–/–). We also developed a fully humanized mAb against hCCR6 with antagonistic activity. The expression pattern of hCCR6 in hCCR6-Tg/mCCR6–/– mice was consistent with the pattern observed in humans. In mouse models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and psoriasis, treatment with anti-hCCR6 mAb was remarkably effective in both preventive and therapeutic regimens. For instance, in the imiquimod model of psoriasis, anti-CCR6 completely abolished all signs of inflammation. Moreover, anti-hCCR6 attenuated clinical symptoms of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein–induced (MOG-induced) EAE and reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells in the central nervous system. CCR6 plays a critical role in Th17 type inflammatory reactions, and CCR6 inhibition may offer an alternative approach for the treatment of these lesions.

Authors

Remy Robert, Caroline Ang, Guizhi Sun, Laurent Juglair, Ee X. Lim, Linda J. Mason, Natalie L. Payne, Claude C.A. Bernard, Charles R. Mackay

×

Figure 6

Anti-hCCR6 mAb prevents infiltration of leukocytes in the skin.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Anti-hCCR6 mAb prevents infiltration of leukocytes in the skin.
(A) Leuk...
(A) Leukocytes were recovered from the skin of mice treated with Vaseline (first column), isotype + imiquimod (IMQ) (second column), anti–mIL-17 mAb + IMQ (third column), and h6H12 + IMQ (fourth column) and analyzed by flow cytometry. All flow cytometric analyses were performed on pooled skin samples from 2 mice (6 mice per group). Results are representative of at least 2 independent experiments and the percentage of cells is shown. First row, flow cytometric analysis displaying the percentage of CD3+γδTCRhi (GDH, upper gate) and CD3+γδTCRlo (GDL, lower gate) among CD45+7-AAD– cells from skin of mice treated as described above. Second row, flow cytometric analysis showing the percentage of Ly6G+ neutrophils among CD45+7-AAD– cells in the skin. Third row, IL-17 intracellular staining among αβTCR+ (live CD45+CD3+ gate). Fourth row, CCR6 and IL-17 expression on γδTCR+ cells (live CD45+CD3+γδTCR+ gate). (B) Quantitative analysis of GDH and GDL T cells (first row); neutrophils (CD45+Ly6G+, second row); IL-17–producing αβTCR+ T cells (third row); and IL-17–producing CCR6+ γδ T cells (fourth row) isolated from whole (2 × 3 cm) dorsal skin samples showing total cell number (left column) and percentage (right column). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 6 per group. For box-and-whisker plots, the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values, the box boundaries represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, and the middle line is the median value. Statistical significance was determined by 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test relative to control isotype–treated group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts