Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Essential role for CCR6 in certain inflammatory diseases demonstrated using specific antagonist and knockin mice
Remy Robert, Caroline Ang, Guizhi Sun, Laurent Juglair, Ee X. Lim, Linda J. Mason, Natalie L. Payne, Claude C.A. Bernard, Charles R. Mackay
Remy Robert, Caroline Ang, Guizhi Sun, Laurent Juglair, Ee X. Lim, Linda J. Mason, Natalie L. Payne, Claude C.A. Bernard, Charles R. Mackay
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Therapeutics

Essential role for CCR6 in certain inflammatory diseases demonstrated using specific antagonist and knockin mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The chemokine receptor CCR6 marks subsets of T cells and innate lymphoid cells that produce IL-17 and IL-22, and as such may play a role in the recruitment of these cells to certain inflammatory sites. However, the precise role of CCR6 has been controversial, in part because no effective monoclonal antibody (mAb) inhibitors against this receptor exist for use in mouse models of inflammation. We circumvented this problem using transgenic mice expressing human CCR6 (hCCR6) under control of its native promoter (hCCR6-Tg/mCCR6–/–). We also developed a fully humanized mAb against hCCR6 with antagonistic activity. The expression pattern of hCCR6 in hCCR6-Tg/mCCR6–/– mice was consistent with the pattern observed in humans. In mouse models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and psoriasis, treatment with anti-hCCR6 mAb was remarkably effective in both preventive and therapeutic regimens. For instance, in the imiquimod model of psoriasis, anti-CCR6 completely abolished all signs of inflammation. Moreover, anti-hCCR6 attenuated clinical symptoms of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein–induced (MOG-induced) EAE and reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells in the central nervous system. CCR6 plays a critical role in Th17 type inflammatory reactions, and CCR6 inhibition may offer an alternative approach for the treatment of these lesions.

Authors

Remy Robert, Caroline Ang, Guizhi Sun, Laurent Juglair, Ee X. Lim, Linda J. Mason, Natalie L. Payne, Claude C.A. Bernard, Charles R. Mackay

×

Figure 4

Anti-hCCR6 mAb prevents infiltration of leukocytes in the CNS.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Anti-hCCR6 mAb prevents infiltration of leukocytes in the CNS.
(A) Leuko...
(A) Leukocytes were recovered from the CNS of isotype- (left panels), anti–mIL-17 mAb– (middle panels), and h6H12-treated (right panels) mice at 24 days after antigen immunization and analyzed by flow cytometry. First row, representative flow cytometry demonstrating CD45+CD4+ cells in the CNS (live cell gate). Second row, CCR6 expression of CD4+ T cells (CD45+CD3+ gate). Third row, IL-17 and IFN-γ intracellular staining of CD4+ T cells isolated from CNS and stimulated for 5 hours with PMA and ionomycin. Fourth row: CCR6 and FoxP3 intracellular staining of CD4+ T cells isolated from CNS. Fifth row: CCR6 and IFN-γ intracellular staining of CD4+ T cells isolated from CNS and stimulated for 5 hours with PMA and ionomycin. All flow cytometric analyses were done on pooled CNS from 2 mice (6 mice per group). Results are representative of at least 2 independent experiments and the percentage of cells is shown. (B) Quantitative analysis of infiltrating T cells (first row), CCR6+CD4+ T cells (second row), IL-17– and IFN-γ–producing CD4+ T cells (third row), CCR6+ Tregs (fourth row), and CCR6+ Th1 cells (fifth row) isolated from whole CNS samples showing total cell number (left columns) and percentage (right columns). Black (isotype; n = 6); light gray (anti–IL-17 mAb, n = 6); dark gray (h6H12 Fc-KO, n = 6). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. For box-and-whisker plots, the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values, the box boundaries represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, and the middle line is the median value. Statistical significance was determined by 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test relative to control isotype–treated group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts