Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Priming is key to effective incorporation of image-guided thermal ablation into immunotherapy protocols
Matthew T. Silvestrini, … , Alexander D. Borowsky, Katherine W. Ferrara
Matthew T. Silvestrini, … , Alexander D. Borowsky, Katherine W. Ferrara
Published March 23, 2017
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2017;2(6):e90521. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.90521.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology Therapeutics

Priming is key to effective incorporation of image-guided thermal ablation into immunotherapy protocols

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Focal therapies play an important role in the treatment of cancers where palliation is desired, local control is needed, or surgical resection is not feasible. Pairing immunotherapy with such focal treatments is particularly attractive; however, there is emerging evidence that focal therapy can have a positive or negative impact on the efficacy of immunotherapy. Thermal ablation is an appealing modality to pair with such protocols, as tumors can be rapidly debulked (cell death occurring within minutes to hours), tumor antigens can be released locally, and treatment can be conducted and repeated without the concerns of radiation-based therapies. In a syngeneic model of epithelial cancer, we found that 7 days of immunotherapy (TLR9 agonist and checkpoint blockade), prior to thermal ablation, reduced macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells and enhanced IFN-γ–producing CD8+ T cells, the M1 macrophage fraction, and PD-L1 expression on CD45+ cells. Continued treatment with immunotherapy alone or with immunotherapy combined with ablation (primed ablation) then resulted in a complete response in 80% of treated mice at day 90, and primed ablation expanded CD8+ T cells as compared with all control groups. When the tumor burden was increased by implantation of 3 orthotopic tumors, successive primed ablation of 2 discrete lesions resulted in survival of 60% of treated mice as compared with 25% of mice treated with immunotherapy alone. Alternatively, when immunotherapy was begun immediately after thermal ablation, the abscopal effect was diminished and none of the mice within the cohort exhibited a complete response. In summary, we found that immunotherapy begun before ablation can be curative and can enhance efficacy in the presence of a high tumor burden. Two mechanisms have potential to impact the efficacy of immunotherapy when begun immediately after thermal ablation: mechanical changes in the tumor microenvironment and inflammatory-mediated changes in immune phenotype.

Authors

Matthew T. Silvestrini, Elizabeth S. Ingham, Lisa M. Mahakian, Azadeh Kheirolomoom, Yu Liu, Brett Z. Fite, Sarah M. Tam, Samantha T. Tucci, Katherine D. Watson, Andrew W. Wong, Arta M. Monjazeb, Neil E. Hubbard, William J. Murphy, Alexander D. Borowsky, Katherine W. Ferrara

×

Figure 7

Sequential multisite thermoablative immunotherapy (TA-immunotherapy) enhances response.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Sequential multisite thermoablative immunotherapy (TA-immunotherapy) enh...
(A–C) Treatment with single-site TA-immunotherapy (ablation + CpG + αPD-1-Prime) results in heterogeneous lesions by day 38 (n = 4). (A) Histological section of ablation + CpG + αPD-1-Prime–treated tumor with boxes at regions of interest. Scale bar: 4 mm. (B) Enlarged view of red box, with local inflammation (infiltration of leukocytes), hemorrhage (black arrows), and necrotic tumor cells containing ghosted nuclei (red arrow). Scale bar: 200 μm. (C) Enlarged view of green box with heat fixation (red arrow), tumor necrosis, and collagen remodeling (black arrow). Scale bar: 200 μm. (D–H) Mice bearing 3 NDL tumors were treated with priming and multisite ablation. Tumor growth was followed until an animal from the group was euthanized (tumor diameter >1.5 cm). Treatment cohorts were NT control (n = 4), CpG + αPD-1-Prime (n = 4), and ablation + CpG + αPD-1-Prime (n = 5), where data are plotted as mean ± SEM. Mice per group examined in 2 separate experiments. (D) Mice were orthotopically transplanted with NDL tumor biopsies in the ninth (i), fourth (ii), and second mammary fat pad (iii). (E) Regimen of multisite administration of ablation + CpG + αPD-1-Prime. CpG was injected intratumorally (i.t., 100 μg), and αPD-1 was injected i.p. (200 μg). (F) Effect of multisite administration on tumor growth in nontreated (iii) and (G) left-treated (i) tumors. (H) Survival outcomes for mice treated with the multisite priming protocol CpG + αPD-1-Prime (n = 4), ablation + CpG + αPD-1-Prime (n = 5), and NT Control (n = 4).

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts