Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Priming is key to effective incorporation of image-guided thermal ablation into immunotherapy protocols
Matthew T. Silvestrini, … , Alexander D. Borowsky, Katherine W. Ferrara
Matthew T. Silvestrini, … , Alexander D. Borowsky, Katherine W. Ferrara
Published March 23, 2017
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2017;2(6):e90521. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.90521.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology Therapeutics

Priming is key to effective incorporation of image-guided thermal ablation into immunotherapy protocols

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Focal therapies play an important role in the treatment of cancers where palliation is desired, local control is needed, or surgical resection is not feasible. Pairing immunotherapy with such focal treatments is particularly attractive; however, there is emerging evidence that focal therapy can have a positive or negative impact on the efficacy of immunotherapy. Thermal ablation is an appealing modality to pair with such protocols, as tumors can be rapidly debulked (cell death occurring within minutes to hours), tumor antigens can be released locally, and treatment can be conducted and repeated without the concerns of radiation-based therapies. In a syngeneic model of epithelial cancer, we found that 7 days of immunotherapy (TLR9 agonist and checkpoint blockade), prior to thermal ablation, reduced macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells and enhanced IFN-γ–producing CD8+ T cells, the M1 macrophage fraction, and PD-L1 expression on CD45+ cells. Continued treatment with immunotherapy alone or with immunotherapy combined with ablation (primed ablation) then resulted in a complete response in 80% of treated mice at day 90, and primed ablation expanded CD8+ T cells as compared with all control groups. When the tumor burden was increased by implantation of 3 orthotopic tumors, successive primed ablation of 2 discrete lesions resulted in survival of 60% of treated mice as compared with 25% of mice treated with immunotherapy alone. Alternatively, when immunotherapy was begun immediately after thermal ablation, the abscopal effect was diminished and none of the mice within the cohort exhibited a complete response. In summary, we found that immunotherapy begun before ablation can be curative and can enhance efficacy in the presence of a high tumor burden. Two mechanisms have potential to impact the efficacy of immunotherapy when begun immediately after thermal ablation: mechanical changes in the tumor microenvironment and inflammatory-mediated changes in immune phenotype.

Authors

Matthew T. Silvestrini, Elizabeth S. Ingham, Lisa M. Mahakian, Azadeh Kheirolomoom, Yu Liu, Brett Z. Fite, Sarah M. Tam, Samantha T. Tucci, Katherine D. Watson, Andrew W. Wong, Arta M. Monjazeb, Neil E. Hubbard, William J. Murphy, Alexander D. Borowsky, Katherine W. Ferrara

×

Figure 2

Thermal ablation alters the tumor microenvironment and intratumoral transport kinetics of small molecules and proteins.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Thermal ablation alters the tumor microenvironment and intratumoral tran...
(A–F) Tumor permeability of proteins after thermal ablation was assessed in vivo by tracking Copper-64–labeled BSA (64Cu-BSA) with positron emission tomography at (A) 0.5, (B) 6, (C) 18, (D) 24, and (E) 48 hours. A single tumor in a bilateral NDL tumor–bearing mouse was ablated (white arrow). Also visible are contralateral tumors (red arrow). Tracer kinetics and biodistribution were plotted for the (F) maximum intratumoral accumulation of 64Cu-BSA versus time, revealing a temporal peak of the spatial mean and maximum occurring at 6 hours after injection (n = 4 per cohort, data are mean ± SEM). (G and H) Increased vascularization of the tumor-draining lymph node 0.5 hours after tumor ablation upon H&E histological staining (n = 3). Scale bar: 300 μm. (G) Draining lymph node following thermal ablation with green box at location of interest. (H) View of enhanced vascularization within the lymph node indicated by green arrows. (I–N) Tumor permeability to small molecules after thermal ablation was assessed in vivo with contrast enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (CET1wMRI) (n = 3). (I) Gadoteridol was administered immediately before (J) ablation (red arrow). (K) Gadoteridol accumulated in the ablated region 3 hours after injection and ablation. (L) Contrast was readministered at 3 hours; additional accumulation was not detected. (M) At 20 hours after injection and ablation, intratumoral gadoteridol accumulation had cleared. (N) After 20 hours, gadoteridol readministration resulted in accumulation in the surrounding tumor rim (blue arrows) but not within in the ablated tissue. (O–Q) Mechanisms for enhanced accumulation 48 hours after thermal ablation with H&E (n = 8). (O) Representative tumor following ablation with green and red box at locations of interest. Scale bar: 3 mm. (P) Image from red box of heat-fixed tissue with shrunken but intact nuclei and preservation of tissue architecture (black arrow) surrounded by discohesive and nonviable tumor tissue with some ghosted nuclei and local edema (yellow arrow). Scale bar: 60 μm. (Q) Image from green box of inflammation observed, where leukocytes are densely located in the periphery of the tumor (yellow arrows). Scale bar: 60 μm.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts