Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Panobinostat acts synergistically with ibrutinib in diffuse large B cell lymphoma cells with MyD88 L265P mutations
Patrizia Mondello, Elliott J. Brea, Elisa De Stanchina, Eneda Toska, Aaron Y. Chang, Myles Fennell, Venkatraman Seshan, Ralph Garippa, David A. Scheinberg, José Baselga, Hans-Guido Wendel, Anas Younes
Patrizia Mondello, Elliott J. Brea, Elisa De Stanchina, Eneda Toska, Aaron Y. Chang, Myles Fennell, Venkatraman Seshan, Ralph Garippa, David A. Scheinberg, José Baselga, Hans-Guido Wendel, Anas Younes
View: Text | PDF | Corrigendum
Research Article Hematology Oncology

Panobinostat acts synergistically with ibrutinib in diffuse large B cell lymphoma cells with MyD88 L265P mutations

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) frequently harbors genetic alterations that activate the B cell receptor (BCR) and TLR pathways, which converge to activate NF-κB. While selective inhibition of BTK with ibrutinib causes clinical responses in relapsed DLBCL patients, most responses are partial and of a short duration. Here, we demonstrated that MyD88 silencing enhanced ibrutinib efficacy in DLBCL cells harboring MyD88 L265P mutations. Chemical downregulation of MyD88 expression with HDAC inhibitors also synergized with ibrutinib. We demonstrate that HDAC inhibitor regulation of MyD88 expression is mediated by STAT3. In turn, STAT3 silencing caused a decrease in MyD88 mRNA and protein levels, and enhanced the ibrutinib antilymphoma effect in MyD88 mutant DLBCL cells. Induced mutations in the STAT3 binding site in the MyD88 promotor region was associated with a decrease in MyD88 transcriptional activity. We also demonstrate that treatment with the HDAC inhibitor panobinostat decreased phosphorylated STAT3 binding to the MyD88 promotor. Accordingly, combined treatment with panobinostat and ibrutinib resulted in enhanced inhibition of NF-κB activity and caused regression of DLBCL xenografts. Our data provide a mechanistic rationale for combining HDAC inhibitors and ibrutinib for the treatment of DLBCL.

Authors

Patrizia Mondello, Elliott J. Brea, Elisa De Stanchina, Eneda Toska, Aaron Y. Chang, Myles Fennell, Venkatraman Seshan, Ralph Garippa, David A. Scheinberg, José Baselga, Hans-Guido Wendel, Anas Younes

×

Figure 2

HDAC inhibitors transcriptionally decrease MyD88.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
HDAC inhibitors transcriptionally decrease MyD88.
(A) Western blot showi...
(A) Western blot showing downregulation of MyD88 in HBL-1 after treatment with 8 different HDAC inhibitors (SNDX-275, mocetinostat, romidepsin, SAHA, belinostat, and panobinostat) and 2 BET inhibitors (JQ1 and CPI-203) at their IC50 dose for 12 and 24 hours. Drug activity is demonstrated by increased acetylation of histone H3. Cell death is associated to PARP cleavage. (B) Change in relative mRNA levels of MyD88 over time in HBL-1 after treatment with 3 different HDAC inhibitors (panobinostat, romidepsin, and SAHA) at their IC50 dose (0.05, 0.01, and 3 μM, respectively) for the indicated time. Error bars represent SEM of triplicate experiments. (C) Change in relative mRNA levels of MyD88 over time in B cell lymphoma cell line panel (GCB n = 3 and ABC n = 4) after treatment with romidepsin 0.01 μM for 6 and 24 hours. Error bars represent SEM of triplicate experiments. (D) Box and whiskers plot showing decrease of MyD88 in B cell lymphoma cell line panel (GCB n = 3 and ABC n = 5) after treatment with either 0.05 μM panobinostat or romidepsin 0.01 μM for 6 hours. Error bars represent SEM of triplicate experiments. (E) Representative Western blot confirming decrease in MyD88 level after treatment with 0.01 μM romidepsin for 6 and 24 hours in our B cell lymphoma panel. (F) Relative MyD88 promoter-luciferase activity in 2 representative ABC (HBL-1 and OCI-LY-10) cell lines and 1 GCB (SUDHL-4) cell line. Cells were treated for 12 hours with indicated concentration of either panobinostat, romidepsin, or DMSO. Cells were incubated with 500 ng/ml of INF-γ as positive control for TLR activation. Error bars represent SEM of triplicates. Differences between groups were calculated with 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s test. ***P < 0.0005; ****P < 0.0001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts