Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Quantitative evaluation of the antiretroviral efficacy of dolutegravir
Sarah B. Laskey, Robert F. Siliciano
Sarah B. Laskey, Robert F. Siliciano
View: Text | PDF
Research Article AIDS/HIV Virology

Quantitative evaluation of the antiretroviral efficacy of dolutegravir

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The second-generation HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) dolutegravir (DTG) has had a major impact on the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Here we describe important but previously undetermined pharmacodynamic parameters for DTG. We show that the dose-response curve slope, which indicates cooperativity and is a major determinant of antiviral activity, is higher for DTG than for first-generation InSTIs. This steepness does not reflect inhibition of multiple steps in the HIV-1 life cycle, as is the case for allosteric integrase inhibitors and HIV-1 protease inhibitors. We also show that degree of independence, a metric of interaction favorability between antiretroviral drugs, is high for DTG and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Finally, we demonstrate poor selective advantage for HIV-1 bearing InSTI resistance mutations. Selective advantage, which incorporates both the magnitude of resistance conferred by a mutation and its fitness cost, explains the high genetic barrier to DTG resistance. Together, these parameters provide an explanation for the remarkable clinical success of DTG.

Authors

Sarah B. Laskey, Robert F. Siliciano

×

Figure 2

Efficacy of dolutegravir (DTG) alone and in combination with nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Efficacy of dolutegravir (DTG) alone and in combination with nucleoside ...
(A) Median-effect curves for individual drugs and drug combinations. Solid lines show experimentally determined dose-response relationships, with color distinguishing the drug(s) used. The gray combination line shows the experimentally measured efficacy of the combination specified in the label above each chart. Dashed lines show the Loewe additivity (red) and Bliss independence (blue) model predictions for combined efficacy given the experimentally determined efficacies of individual drugs. Drug concentrations [D] were chosen so that all drugs would have similar efficacy at [D0]: [D0,DTG] = 52.7 nM; [D0,ABC] = 558 nM; [D0,3TC] = 434 nM; [D0,TDF] = 354 nM; [D0,FTC] = 110 nM. Error bars show the standard deviation of 6 blood donors. Inset pie charts show degree of independence calculated for drug combinations, according to the color scale in the legend. Each pie slice shows the results from a different blood donor. (B) Average instantaneous inhibitory potential (IIP) over a 24-hour dosing period for individual drugs and their combinations. A dashed line at IIP = 5 shows the minimum IIP for a fully suppressive antiretroviral regimen (10). ABC, abacavir; 3TC, lamivudine; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; FTC, emtricitabine.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts