Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Quantitative evaluation of the antiretroviral efficacy of dolutegravir
Sarah B. Laskey, Robert F. Siliciano
Sarah B. Laskey, Robert F. Siliciano
View: Text | PDF
Research Article AIDS/HIV Virology

Quantitative evaluation of the antiretroviral efficacy of dolutegravir

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The second-generation HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) dolutegravir (DTG) has had a major impact on the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Here we describe important but previously undetermined pharmacodynamic parameters for DTG. We show that the dose-response curve slope, which indicates cooperativity and is a major determinant of antiviral activity, is higher for DTG than for first-generation InSTIs. This steepness does not reflect inhibition of multiple steps in the HIV-1 life cycle, as is the case for allosteric integrase inhibitors and HIV-1 protease inhibitors. We also show that degree of independence, a metric of interaction favorability between antiretroviral drugs, is high for DTG and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Finally, we demonstrate poor selective advantage for HIV-1 bearing InSTI resistance mutations. Selective advantage, which incorporates both the magnitude of resistance conferred by a mutation and its fitness cost, explains the high genetic barrier to DTG resistance. Together, these parameters provide an explanation for the remarkable clinical success of DTG.

Authors

Sarah B. Laskey, Robert F. Siliciano

×

Figure 1

The steep dolutegravir (DTG) slope is not due to activity late in the HIV-1 life cycle.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
The steep dolutegravir (DTG) slope is not due to activity late in the HI...
(A) Semi-log and median-effect curves showing the DTG dose-response relationship (purple) and a hypothetical drug with the same IC50 and a slope of m = 1 (gray). DTG concentration is normalized to [DTG0], the empirical IC50. Logarithmic DTG concentration (x axis) is plotted against a linear (semi-log) or a logarithmic (median-effect) measure of efficacy (y axis). fa is the fraction of infection events affected, i.e., inhibited, by DTG at the stated concentration; fu is the fraction of infection events unaffected by DTG, and fu = 1 – fa. Error bars represent the standard deviation of 6 different blood donors. (B) Schematic of inoculum preparation for the life cycle assay, which differentiates between antiviral activity early and late in the HIV-1 life cycle. Virus is produced either in the presence or the absence of a drug, and then drug/virus mixtures are used to infect primary CD4+ T lymphoblasts. (C) Median-effect dose-response curves for BI-D (left), raltegravir (RAL, center), and DTG (right). Open circles represent values below the detection limit. The top row shows results from 5 blood donors; error bars represent the standard deviation of 3 technical replicates. The bottom row shows results averaged over 5 blood donors in each condition; error bars represent 1 standard deviation. Reference concentrations present during virus production are: [D0,DTG] = 45 nM; [D0,RAL] = 97 nM; [D0,BI-D] = 50 nM. Due to the design of this assay, drugs are diluted 20-fold between virus production and infection.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts