Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Epigenetic regulation of macrophage polarization and inflammation by DNA methylation in obesity
Xianfeng Wang, Qiang Cao, Liqing Yu, Huidong Shi, Bingzhong Xue, Hang Shi
Xianfeng Wang, Qiang Cao, Liqing Yu, Huidong Shi, Bingzhong Xue, Hang Shi
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Inflammation

Epigenetic regulation of macrophage polarization and inflammation by DNA methylation in obesity

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Obesity is associated with increased classically activated M1 adipose tissue macrophages (ATMs) and decreased alternatively activated M2 ATMs, both of which contribute to obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. We find that inhibiting DNA methylation pharmacologically using 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine or genetically by DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) deletion promotes alternative activation and suppresses inflammation in macrophages. Consistently, mice with myeloid DNMT1 deficiency exhibit enhanced macrophage alternative activation, suppressed macrophage inflammation, and are protected from obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance. The promoter and 5′-untranslated region of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ1 (PPARγ1) are enriched with CpGs and are epigenetically regulated. The saturated fatty acids stearate and palmitate and the inflammatory cytokine TNF-α significantly increase, whereas the TH2 cytokine IL-4 significantly decreases PPARγ1 promoter DNA methylation. Accordingly, inhibiting PPARγ1 promoter DNA methylation pharmacologically using 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine or genetically by DNMT1 deletion promotes macrophage alternative activation. Our data therefore establish DNA hypermethylation at the PPARγ1 promoter induced by obesity-related factors as a critical determinant of ATM proinflammatory activation and inflammation, which contributes to insulin resistance in obesity.

Authors

Xianfeng Wang, Qiang Cao, Liqing Yu, Huidong Shi, Bingzhong Xue, Hang Shi

×

Figure 1

DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) expression is lower in M2 than in M1 adipose tissue macrophages (ATMs) and is upregulated in isolated ATMs from ob/ob mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) expression is lower in M2 than in M1 adi...
(A–G) Expression of M1 and M2 markers, including CD11c (A), iNOS (B), TNF-α (C), IL-1β (D), CD206 (E), ARG1 (F), and IL-10 (G), in M1, M2, double+ and double– ATMs isolated from adipose tissue of 8- to 10-week-old male C57BL/6J mice. Cells from 3 to 4 mice were pooled for RNA isolation and gene expression measurements. M1, F4/80+CD11c+CD206–; M2, F4/80+CD11c–CD206+; double+, F4/80+CD11c+CD206+; double–, F4/80+CD11c–CD206–. (H) DNMT1 expression in M1 and M2 ATMs. (I–K) M1 (I) and M2 (J) markers and DNMT1 (K) expression in ATMs isolated from 14-week-old lean and ob/ob mice. Cells from 3 to 4 lean mice were pooled, whereas cells from individual ob/ob mice were used for RNA isolation and gene expression measurements. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. n = 3–7. Groups labeled with different letters are statistically different from each other. *P < 0.05. Differences between groups were analyzed for statistical significance by Student’s t test or ANOVA with Fischer’s probable least-squares difference post hoc test.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts