Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
PD-1 blockade enhances the vaccination-induced immune response in glioma
Joseph P. Antonios, … , Linda M. Liau, Robert M. Prins
Joseph P. Antonios, … , Linda M. Liau, Robert M. Prins
Published July 7, 2016
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2016;1(10):e87059. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.87059.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

PD-1 blockade enhances the vaccination-induced immune response in glioma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

DC vaccination with autologous tumor lysate has demonstrated promising results for the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) in preclinical and clinical studies. While the vaccine appears capable of inducing T cell infiltration into tumors, the effectiveness of active vaccination in progressively growing tumors is less profound. In parallel, a number of studies have identified negative costimulatory pathways, such as programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1), as relevant mediators of the intratumoral immune responses. Clinical responses to PD-1 pathway inhibition, however, have also been varied. To evaluate the relevance to established glioma, the effects of PD-1 blockade following DC vaccination were tested in intracranial (i.c.) glioma tumor–bearing mice. Treatment with both DC vaccination and PD-1 mAb blockade resulted in long-term survival, while neither agent alone induced a survival benefit in animals with larger, established tumors. This survival benefit was completely dependent on CD8+ T cells. Additionally, DC vaccine plus PD-1 mAb blockade resulted in the upregulation of integrin homing and immunologic memory markers on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). In clinical samples, DC vaccination in GBM patients was associated with upregulation of PD-1 expression in vivo, while ex vivo blockade of PD-1 on freshly isolated TILs dramatically enhanced autologous tumor cell cytolysis. These findings strongly suggest that the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway plays an important role in the adaptive immune resistance of established GBM in response to antitumor active vaccination and provide us with a rationale for the clinical translation of this combination therapy.

Authors

Joseph P. Antonios, Horacio Soto, Richard G. Everson, Joey Orpilla, Diana Moughon, Namjo Shin, Shaina Sedighim, William H. Yong, Gang Li, Timothy F. Cloughesy, Linda M. Liau, Robert M. Prins

×

Figure 3

PD-1 mAb blockade enhances the intratumoral CD8+ T cell response.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
PD-1 mAb blockade enhances the intratumoral CD8+ T cell response.
Surviv...
Survival of mice from control (tumor bearing, no treatment), PD-1 mAb, DC vaccine, and DC vaccine plus PD-1 mAb treatment groups when (A) CD4+ cells or (B) CD8+ cells were depleted is shown (n = 6/group). (C) An absolute number T lymphocytes was isolated from tumor-bearing cerebral hemispheres and cells were then analyzed by flow cytometry (***P < 0.001). (D) The absolute CD8+ count was plotted against the percentage of CD25+CD8+ activated lymphocytes and compared across different treatment groups (n = 4/group) (**P<0.01). Data shown are representative of 1 experiment repeated 4 times with similar endings. Each point represents 1 subject (A–D). Box-and-whisker plots were used to graphically represent the median (line within box), upper- and lower- quartile (bounds of box), and maximum and minimum values (bars) (C). Survival differences were calculated using log-rank statistical tests and graphed using the method of Kaplan-Meier (A and B), and the Student’s t test was used to calculate statistical significance at individual time points.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts